Telepathy: the story of a synchronization, explained

[Graham Cooper]

Hi Danilo you are talking about 'connection' as intelepathy.  focus
just on this. what are you saying precisely. and where does
'schizophrenia' and 'fields' come into it?

Uh... I have like one third gigabyte text on the theme. This is only a
highlight. In fact, it seems to be pure electromagnetic theory
intermixed with computing theory. Nothing otherworldly actually. The
thesis is still: the problem of discerning the Human meaningful
information from residual activity of the Human brain is nonexistent
given the computing power of the Human brain. It is a no problem per
se. Then... etc.
Danilo J Bonsignore

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.

Chaos theory, events diverge.

Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)

You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.


THEORY OF EVERYTHING
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.org.mensa/browse_thread/thread/1f205a284284331e/df7692b886b4d87e

WHY IS SUGAR SWEET
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/browse_thread/thread/1a5adaff745677f6/ab218361ac5ff24343

SENDING MESSAGES THROUGH TIME IN QUANTUM WORMHOLES
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/b2461a1a1ac9a9d3/5813ba669b7e716c



Herc

[[e-mail]]

On 2/23/2012 6:48 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic. He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3. I hurried to take my seat
never saying a word and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next. During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives. This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces, intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you. She is upset over your
work. You will have a “to do”, “words” over your …. Job. He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her. He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM. that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit. But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.

The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.

The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.

Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!

Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.

Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.

So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

[Graham Cooper]

Post by ***@teranews.com
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.
The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.
The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.
Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!
Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.
Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.
So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

Wow! An intelligent skeptic!

Try: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html

Herc

[Graham Cooper]

Try:http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html
Herc

In particular:

--------8<----------------------------

12.1 Introduction to links and anchors

HTML offers many of the conventional publishing idioms for rich text
and structured documents, but what separates it from most other markup
languages is its features for hypertext and interactive documents.
This section introduces the link (or hyperlink, or Web link), the
basic hypertext construct. A link is a connection from one Web
resource to another. Although a simple concept, the link has been one
of the primary forces driving the success of the Web.

A link has two ends -- called anchors -- and a direction. The link
starts at the "source" anchor and points to the "destination" anchor,
which may be any Web resource (e.g., an image, a video clip, a sound
bite, a program, an HTML document, an element within an HTML document,
etc.).

12.1.1 Visiting a linked resource

The default behavior associated with a link is the retrieval of
another Web resource. This behavior is commonly and implicitly
obtained by selecting the link (e.g., by clicking, through keyboard
input, etc.).

The following HTML excerpt contains two links, one whose destination
anchor is an HTML document named "chapter2.html" and the other whose
destination anchor is a GIF image in the file "forest.gif":

<BODY>
...some text...
<P>You'll find a lot more in <A href="chapter2.html">chapter two</
A>.
See also this <A href="../images/forest.gif">map of the enchanted
forest.</A>
</BODY>

By activating these links (by clicking with the mouse, through
keyboard input, voice commands, etc.), users may visit these resources


------------------------8<----------


HTH!

Maybe I'm doing it wrong! Let's try again...

********

You'll find a lot more information on my explanation of TELEPATHY at

THEORY OF EVERYTHING

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.org.mensa/browse_thread/thread/1f205a284284331e/df7692b886b4d87e

********

See also this!

WHY IS SUGAR SWEET

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/browse_thread/thread/1a5adaff745677f6/ab218361ac5ff24343

********

And while you're here!

SENDING MESSAGES THROUGH TIME IN QUANTUM WORMHOLES

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/b2461a1a1ac9a9d3/5813ba669b7e716c

********

Here's a bonus picture of 3.1415 made with water vapour.

Loading Image...

Thank you very much, have a good morning, and if I don't see you later
today, good afternoon, good evening and goodnight!

Herc

[vtcapo]

Post by ***@teranews.com
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.
The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.
The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.
Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!
Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.
Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.
So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

I have taken this incident and other cold reading incidents to
different NG’s and they have reacted just like BJACOBY explains. “…
most "skeptics" simply 
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes
as if a real scientist were 
too dumb to know the difference. And then
as icing on the cake there are 
personal attacks on the sanity of the
witnesses to insure that nobody 
has the balls to press the issue
further.”

Frankly speaking I was expecting much of the same coming here and was
quite surprised that BJACOBY nailed it on the head. Some things are
just beyond our current physics to explain.

Quantum Theory can account for the random possibility but not for the
repeated accuracy concerning this and I would have to presume other
psychic’s cold readings. And by cold reading I mean he NEVER asks you
a question. It isn’t the con of those who presume the role of psychic
and proceed to fish for an answer by asking you question after
question before the reading. He would just tell you what was coming up
with almost 100% accuracy.

This in not to suggest that science will never come up with an answer.
It just hasn’t caught up to what the Mystics knew and what this
psychic explained to me in a private consultation. That being, there
is a thin veil that separates this 3D reality from the astral
dimension. This thin veil is constantly penetrated and the astral
bleeds through so to speak, hence all the reported paranormal events.

In reference to this psychic and his methodology, he explained that he
is able, in trance, to travel out of body to the Akashic Record (a
record of time past, present and PROBABLE FUTURES) view them and
correlate what is coming up next for you based on your previous causes
and effects. He also prefaced this by saying that EVERYTHING is
recorded.
All your thoughts, words and deeds. I would assume there is some
scientific correlation to this.

Now, who am I to argue with someone who made such an indelible
impression by making actuate predicts that extended 40 years into my
future. They certainly can be debated and doubted by naysayers but
not dismissed as Graham Cooper suggests and explained away with “Macro
Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.”

Is protecting the current scientific paradigm so important to negate
the obvious?

That being, 3D is NOT all that there is…

RT

[Graham Cooper]

Post by vtcapo

Post by ***@teranews.com
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.
The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.
The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.
Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!
Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.
Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.
So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

I have taken this incident and other cold reading incidents to
different  NG’s and they have reacted just like BJACOBY explains. “…
most "skeptics" simply 
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes
as if a real scientist were 
too dumb to know the difference. And then
as icing on the cake there are 
personal attacks on the sanity of the
witnesses to insure that nobody 
has the balls to press the issue
further.”
Frankly speaking I was expecting much of the same coming here and was
quite surprised that BJACOBY nailed it on the head.  Some things are
just beyond our current physics to explain.
Quantum Theory can account for the random possibility but not for the
repeated accuracy concerning this and I would have to presume other
psychic’s cold readings.  And by cold reading I mean he NEVER asks you
a question. It isn’t the con of those who presume the role of psychic
and proceed to fish for an answer by asking you question after
question before the reading. He would just tell you what was coming up
with almost 100% accuracy.
This in not to suggest that science will never come up with an answer.
It just hasn’t caught up to what the Mystics knew and what this
psychic explained to me in a private consultation.  That being, there
is a thin veil that separates this 3D reality from the astral
dimension. This thin veil is constantly penetrated and the astral
bleeds through so to speak, hence all the reported paranormal events.
In reference to this psychic and his methodology, he explained that he
is able, in trance, to travel out of body to the Akashic Record (a
record of time past, present and PROBABLE FUTURES) view them and
correlate what is coming up next for you based on your previous causes
and effects. He also prefaced this by saying that EVERYTHING is
recorded.
All your thoughts, words and deeds.  I would assume there is some
scientific correlation to this.
Now, who am I to argue with someone who made such an indelible
impression by making actuate predicts that extended 40 years into my
future. They certainly can be debated and  doubted by naysayers but
not dismissed as Graham Cooper suggests and explained away with “Macro
Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.”
Is protecting the current scientific paradigm so important to negate
the obvious?
That being, 3D is NOT all that there is…
RT

BJACOBY is a *motivated* skeptic,

while Vtcapo is a methodologist 'believer'.

A number line analogy.



<--SKEPTICS----BJ-----|----VT---BlindFaith--->


So your direction is the same, from a different approach.

Now to answer BJ's question and stance on REPLICATION..

the answer is: No Skeptic or Astrologer alike will duplicate a
successful test!

It took me 2 years to get someone to ask me to read their mind after
blitzing a Zenner Mindreading Test in 2010.

Skeptics don't want to duplicate results, they want to raise the bar,
tighten the protocol, add constraints, increase the odds, add
hecklers, ad homs, defamation, skeptic chanting 10,000 times, ...

I can read your mind 90% accuracy from 3 options, NO TAKERS FOR 10
YEARS!



Herc

[vtcapo]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo

Post by ***@teranews.com
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.
The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.
The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.
Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!
Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.
Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.
So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

I have taken this incident and other cold reading incidents to
different  NG’s and they have reacted just like BJACOBY explains. “…
most "skeptics" simply 
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes
as if a real scientist were 
too dumb to know the difference. And then
as icing on the cake there are 
personal attacks on the sanity of the
witnesses to insure that nobody 
has the balls to press the issue
further.”
Frankly speaking I was expecting much of the same coming here and was
quite surprised that BJACOBY nailed it on the head.  Some things are
just beyond our current physics to explain.
Quantum Theory can account for the random possibility but not for the
repeated accuracy concerning this and I would have to presume other
psychic’s cold readings.  And by cold reading I mean he NEVER asks you
a question. It isn’t the con of those who presume the role of psychic
and proceed to fish for an answer by asking you question after
question before the reading. He would just tell you what was coming up
with almost 100% accuracy.
This in not to suggest that science will never come up with an answer.
It just hasn’t caught up to what the Mystics knew and what this
psychic explained to me in a private consultation.  That being, there
is a thin veil that separates this 3D reality from the astral
dimension. This thin veil is constantly penetrated and the astral
bleeds through so to speak, hence all the reported paranormal events.
In reference to this psychic and his methodology, he explained that he
is able, in trance, to travel out of body to the Akashic Record (a
record of time past, present and PROBABLE FUTURES) view them and
correlate what is coming up next for you based on your previous causes
and effects. He also prefaced this by saying that EVERYTHING is
recorded.
All your thoughts, words and deeds.  I would assume there is some
scientific correlation to this.
Now, who am I to argue with someone who made such an indelible
impression by making actuate predicts that extended 40 years into my
future. They certainly can be debated and  doubted by naysayers but
not dismissed as Graham Cooper suggests and explained away with “Macro
Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.”
Is protecting the current scientific paradigm so important to negate
the obvious?
That being, 3D is NOT all that there is…
RT

BJACOBY is a *motivated* skeptic,
while Vtcapo is a methodologist 'believer'.
A number line analogy.
<--SKEPTICS----BJ-----|----VT---BlindFaith--->
So your direction is the same, from a different approach.
Now to answer BJ's question and stance on REPLICATION..
the answer is:  No Skeptic or Astrologer alike will duplicate a
successful test!
It took me 2 years to get someone to ask me to read their mind after
blitzing a Zenner Mindreading Test in 2010.
Skeptics don't want to duplicate results, they want to raise the bar,
tighten the protocol, add constraints, increase the odds, add
hecklers, ad homs, defamation, skeptic chanting 10,000 times, ...
I can read your mind 90% accuracy from 3 options, NO TAKERS FOR 10
YEARS!
Herc

Graham, believe me, I was the skeptic of the group I traveled with
back in 1972 when the events concerning this psychic occurred. I went
to school for aeronautical engineering and I WAS the Doubting Thomas.
You had to show me and he did more than once.


This is not mind reading as you suggest. Mind reading certainly does
not explain the accuracy of my first reading as well as the other
readings he performed not only on me but others in our group. I think
you are reaching for an explanation. I am just pleased that you
haven’t gotten to the point where you start calling me a liar.


The accuracy of such an off the wall prediction cannot be calculated
as chance. There was no reading my mind concerning my grandmother’s
fall. Did your Zenner Mindreading Test provide you with
prognostications that came true? And what I mean by prognostications,
real events described before the fact. Not an artificial card reading
in a lab setting. I sincerely doubt that. My psychic’s readings where
not 90% accurate, they were nearly 100% accurate with minor
differences such as “she fell and broke her arm” when in fact she
fell and broke her wrist. This has always been a point in the story
that naysayers latch on to. However, the last time I looked my wrist
was part of my arm.

I will leave you with one more incident. This event took place at
another cold reading session at the psychics meeting hall. This is not
my reading but the leader of our group who was sitting next to me.
Like my first reading I am being sincere. Remember, I have no desire
to convince anyone. I have nothing to gain from this other than
someone coming forward with break through analysis showing me how
these events are a con or trick. No skeptic to date has been able to
do this.

Pointing to Roger (our meditation group leader) the psychic said in
matter of fact terms, “I see you driving a vehicle”, he pauses…… “The
wheel comes off”. Immediate shock appears on Roger’s face and the
surrounding audience. You could hear a pin drop. “But don’t worry”, he
said, another pause as if viewing something…”No one will get hurt. You
will be fine”. That was it.

Because if his track record, if we had driven his truck into NYC we
would have taken the train back to Long Island. The very next morning
we thoroughly inspected his vehicle, paying particular attention to
the wheels checking to see if any connecting linkages were worn and
if 
the wheel lugs were loose. All was in order and I remember
telling 
Roger, I think he got this one wrong. Of course in the back
of my mind, what if it’s not HIS vehicle he is talking about. But it
was.

I think it was two days later I come into the commune and see his
truck up on blocks, the right rear wheel is off and Roger is shaking
his head. What in the hell happened I said?
Well, says Roger, I was driving down Greenlawn Boulevard and the
light 
turned yellow. I applied the brakes and thump, the right rear
hits the 
ground and the tire rolls past me as I come to a screeching
stop. No 
one got hurt.

Upon further inspection, the studs on the right rear axle were ALL
sheared off. It was easy to determine the cause. It was stress
failure. Apparently this old truck had carried one too many heavy
loads and the axle failed. There was no way to see this coming
unless 
the axle was put under a microscope or like we used in the
stress lab 
applied magna flux, a solution that would highlight hair
line cracks 
in metal.

The question is, how did the psychic predict this other than the way
he told me by going to the Record? Graham or anyone else, if you can
equate this with mind reading please explain? I have waited over
forty years for a skeptic to come forward with a rational explanation.
The best anyone could do was to call me a liar.

This event prompted me to entertain a private reading session, which
only proved that wherever he was acquiring this information WAS
“other worldly.”

Anyone’s input would be appreciated….

RT
PS One more thing. Can any mathematician out there tell me why Israel
is using the Bible Code? Oh I know there are websites out there that
dismiss this Matrix, which is a conduit to the Record as hocus pocus.
That however does not answer the question as to why Israel and the
Mossad are using it on a daily basis. That’s right, Arcane Cabalistic
Mysticism with the help of computers to insure the preservation of the
State. Do you think they know something?

[Graham Cooper]

Post by vtcapo

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo

Post by ***@teranews.com
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.
The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.
The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.
Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!
Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.
Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.
So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

I have taken this incident and other cold reading incidents to
different  NG’s and they have reacted just like BJACOBY explains. “…
most "skeptics" simply 
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes
as if a real scientist were 
too dumb to know the difference. And then
as icing on the cake there are 
personal attacks on the sanity of the
witnesses to insure that nobody 
has the balls to press the issue
further.”
Frankly speaking I was expecting much of the same coming here and was
quite surprised that BJACOBY nailed it on the head.  Some things are
just beyond our current physics to explain.
Quantum Theory can account for the random possibility but not for the
repeated accuracy concerning this and I would have to presume other
psychic’s cold readings.  And by cold reading I mean he NEVER asks you
a question. It isn’t the con of those who presume the role of psychic
and proceed to fish for an answer by asking you question after
question before the reading. He would just tell you what was coming up
with almost 100% accuracy.
This in not to suggest that science will never come up with an answer.
It just hasn’t caught up to what the Mystics knew and what this
psychic explained to me in a private consultation.  That being, there
is a thin veil that separates this 3D reality from the astral
dimension. This thin veil is constantly penetrated and the astral
bleeds through so to speak, hence all the reported paranormal events.
In reference to this psychic and his methodology, he explained that he
is able, in trance, to travel out of body to the Akashic Record (a
record of time past, present and PROBABLE FUTURES) view them and
correlate what is coming up next for you based on your previous causes
and effects. He also prefaced this by saying that EVERYTHING is
recorded.
All your thoughts, words and deeds.  I would assume there is some
scientific correlation to this.
Now, who am I to argue with someone who made such an indelible
impression by making actuate predicts that extended 40 years into my
future. They certainly can be debated and  doubted by naysayers but
not dismissed as Graham Cooper suggests and explained away with “Macro
Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.”
Is protecting the current scientific paradigm so important to negate
the obvious?
That being, 3D is NOT all that there is…
RT

BJACOBY is a *motivated* skeptic,
while Vtcapo is a methodologist 'believer'.
A number line analogy.
<--SKEPTICS----BJ-----|----VT---BlindFaith--->
So your direction is the same, from a different approach.
Now to answer BJ's question and stance on REPLICATION..
the answer is:  No Skeptic or Astrologer alike will duplicate a
successful test!
It took me 2 years to get someone to ask me to read their mind after
blitzing a Zenner Mindreading Test in 2010.
Skeptics don't want to duplicate results, they want to raise the bar,
tighten the protocol, add constraints, increase the odds, add
hecklers, ad homs, defamation, skeptic chanting 10,000 times, ...
I can read your mind 90% accuracy from 3 options, NO TAKERS FOR 10
YEARS!
Herc

Graham, believe me, I was the skeptic of the group I traveled with
back in 1972 when the events concerning this psychic occurred.  I went
to school for aeronautical engineering and  I WAS the Doubting Thomas.
You had to show me and he did more than once.
This is not mind reading as you suggest. Mind reading certainly does
not explain the accuracy of my first reading as well as the other
readings he performed not only on me but others in our group. I think
you are reaching for an explanation. I am just pleased that you
haven’t gotten to the point where you start calling me a liar.
The accuracy of such an off the wall prediction cannot be calculated
as chance.  There was no reading my mind concerning my grandmother’s
fall. Did your Zenner Mindreading Test provide you with
prognostications that came true? And what I mean by prognostications,
real events described before the fact. Not an artificial card reading
in a lab setting. I sincerely doubt that.  My psychic’s readings where
not 90% accurate, they were nearly 100% accurate with minor
differences such as  “she fell and broke her arm” when in fact she
fell and broke her wrist.  This has always been a point in the story
that naysayers latch on to.  However, the last time I looked my wrist
was part of my arm.
I will leave you with one more incident. This event took place at
another cold reading session at the psychics meeting hall. This is not
my reading but the leader of our group who was sitting next to me.
Like my first reading I am being sincere. Remember, I have no desire
to convince anyone. I have nothing to gain from this other than
someone coming forward with break through analysis showing me how
these events are a con or trick. No skeptic to date has been able to
do this.
Pointing to Roger (our meditation group leader) the psychic said in
matter of fact terms,  “I see you driving a vehicle”, he pauses…… “The
wheel comes off”. Immediate shock appears on Roger’s face and the
surrounding audience. You could hear a pin drop. “But don’t worry”, he
said, another pause as if viewing something…”No one will get hurt. You
will be fine”.  That was it.
Because if his track record, if we had driven his truck into NYC  we
would have taken the train back to Long Island. The very next morning
we thoroughly inspected his vehicle, paying particular attention to
the wheels checking to see if any connecting linkages were worn and
if 
the wheel lugs were loose.  All was in order and I remember
telling 
Roger, I think he got this one wrong. Of course in the back
of my mind, what if it’s not HIS vehicle he is talking about. But it
was.
I think it was two days later I come into the commune and see his
truck up on blocks, the right rear wheel is off and Roger is shaking
his head. What in the hell happened I said?
Well, says Roger, I was driving down Greenlawn Boulevard and the
light 
turned yellow. I applied the brakes and thump, the right rear
hits the 
ground and the tire rolls past me as I come to a screeching
stop. No 
one got hurt.
Upon further inspection, the studs on the right rear axle were ALL
sheared off. It was easy to determine the cause. It was stress
failure.  Apparently this old truck had carried one too many heavy
loads and the axle failed.  There was no way to see this coming
unless 
the axle was put under a microscope or like we used in the
stress lab 
applied magna flux, a solution that would highlight hair
line cracks 
in metal.
The question is, how did the psychic predict this other than the way
he told me by going to the Record? Graham or anyone else, if you can
equate this with mind reading please explain?  I have waited over
forty years for a skeptic to come forward with a rational explanation.
The best anyone could do was to call me a liar.
This event prompted me to entertain a private reading session, which
only proved that wherever he was acquiring this information WAS
“other worldly.”
Anyone’s input would be appreciated….
RT
PS One more thing. Can any mathematician out there tell me why Israel
is using the Bible Code? Oh I know there are websites out there that
dismiss this Matrix, which is a conduit to the Record as hocus pocus.
That however does not answer the question as to why Israel and the
Mossad are using it on a daily basis. That’s right, Arcane Cabalistic
Mysticism with the help of computers to insure the preservation of the
State.  Do you think they know something?

You have very spurious evidence of your own credentials validating
numerous FACTS about the cause of the wheel falling off so it ties in
the the psychic being right!

At any rate, it's not verifiable, or reproducible, or easily observed.

A Zenner Test, you pick one of

CIRCLE
SQUARE
STAR
WAVY LINES

OK picked one yet? C O N C E N T R A T E...

Herc

[vtcapo]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo

Post by ***@teranews.com
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.
The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.
The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.
Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!
Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.
Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.
So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

I have taken this incident and other cold reading incidents to
different  NG’s and they have reacted just like BJACOBY explains. “…
most "skeptics" simply 
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes
as if a real scientist were 
too dumb to know the difference. And then
as icing on the cake there are 
personal attacks on the sanity of the
witnesses to insure that nobody 
has the balls to press the issue
further.”
Frankly speaking I was expecting much of the same coming here and was
quite surprised that BJACOBY nailed it on the head.  Some things are
just beyond our current physics to explain.
Quantum Theory can account for the random possibility but not for the
repeated accuracy concerning this and I would have to presume other
psychic’s cold readings.  And by cold reading I mean he NEVER asks you
a question. It isn’t the con of those who presume the role of psychic
and proceed to fish for an answer by asking you question after
question before the reading. He would just tell you what was coming up
with almost 100% accuracy.
This in not to suggest that science will never come up with an answer.
It just hasn’t caught up to what the Mystics knew and what this
psychic explained to me in a private consultation.  That being, there
is a thin veil that separates this 3D reality from the astral
dimension. This thin veil is constantly penetrated and the astral
bleeds through so to speak, hence all the reported paranormal events.
In reference to this psychic and his methodology, he explained that he
is able, in trance, to travel out of body to the Akashic Record (a
record of time past, present and PROBABLE FUTURES) view them and
correlate what is coming up next for you based on your previous causes
and effects. He also prefaced this by saying that EVERYTHING is
recorded.
All your thoughts, words and deeds.  I would assume there is some
scientific correlation to this.
Now, who am I to argue with someone who made such an indelible
impression by making actuate predicts that extended 40 years into my
future. They certainly can be debated and  doubted by naysayers but
not dismissed as Graham Cooper suggests and explained away with “Macro
Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.”
Is protecting the current scientific paradigm so important to negate
the obvious?
That being, 3D is NOT all that there is…
RT

BJACOBY is a *motivated* skeptic,
while Vtcapo is a methodologist 'believer'.
A number line analogy.
<--SKEPTICS----BJ-----|----VT---BlindFaith--->
So your direction is the same, from a different approach.
Now to answer BJ's question and stance on REPLICATION..
the answer is:  No Skeptic or Astrologer alike will duplicate a
successful test!
It took me 2 years to get...

read more »
You have very spurious evidence of your own credentials
validating numerous FACTS about the cause of the wheel
falling off so it ties in the the psychic being right!
At any rate, it's not verifiable, or reproducible, or
easily observed.
A Zenner Test, you pick one of
CIRCLE
SQUARE
STAR
WAVY LINES

OK picked one yet? C O N C E N T R A T E...
Herc

Graham, which synonym would you substitute for the word spurious;
false, bogus, fake, forged or counterfeit? Calling me a liar would
have been easier but you were being kind.

I know this will take a leap of faith on your behalf but assuming you
trust my sincerity, we can both agree that it is not verifiable by any
standard of science or that the exact event is not reproducible but it
sure as hell was easily observed.

I think you blinked…

RT
PS I made my pick. Better than that, how about telling me just like
the psychic, what will be coming up next for me? Now make sure this is
something personal not generic and cannot pertain to anyone but me. Do
this and I will have to rethink my position. Trust that I will give
you an honest reply.
PPS No one challenging my Bible Code accusations? Thought so……

[vtcapo]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo

Post by ***@teranews.com
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.
The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.
The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.
Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!
Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.
Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.
So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

I have taken this incident and other cold reading incidents to
different  NG’s and they have reacted just like BJACOBY explains. “…
most "skeptics" simply 
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes
as if a real scientist were 
too dumb to know the difference. And then
as icing on the cake there are 
personal attacks on the sanity of the
witnesses to insure that nobody 
has the balls to press the issue
further.”
Frankly speaking I was expecting much of the same coming here and was
quite surprised that BJACOBY nailed it on the head.  Some things are
just beyond our current physics to explain.
Quantum Theory can account for the random possibility but not for the
repeated accuracy concerning this and I would have to presume other
psychic’s cold readings.  And by cold reading I mean he NEVER asks you
a question. It isn’t the con of those who presume the role of psychic
and proceed to fish for an answer by asking you question after
question before the reading. He would just tell you what was coming up
with almost 100% accuracy.
This in not to suggest that science will never come up with an answer.
It just hasn’t caught up to what the Mystics knew and what this
psychic explained to me in a private consultation.  That being, there
is a thin veil that separates this 3D reality from the astral
dimension. This thin veil is constantly penetrated and the astral
bleeds through so to speak, hence all the reported paranormal events.
In reference to this psychic and his methodology, he explained that he
is able, in trance, to travel out of body to the Akashic Record (a
record of time past, present and PROBABLE FUTURES) view them and
correlate what is coming up next for you based on your previous causes
and effects. He also prefaced this by saying that EVERYTHING is
recorded.
All your thoughts, words and deeds.  I would assume there is some
scientific correlation to this.
Now, who am I to argue with someone who made such an indelible
impression by making actuate predicts that extended 40 years into my
future. They certainly can be debated and  doubted by naysayers but
not dismissed as Graham Cooper suggests and explained away with “Macro
Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.”
Is protecting the current scientific paradigm so important to negate
the obvious?
That being, 3D is NOT all that there is…
RT

BJACOBY is a *motivated* skeptic,
while Vtcapo is a methodologist 'believer'.
A number line analogy.
<--SKEPTICS----BJ-----|----VT---BlindFaith--->
So your direction is the same, from a different approach.
Now to answer BJ's question and stance on REPLICATION..
the answer is:  No Skeptic or Astrologer alike will duplicate a
successful test!
It took me 2 years to get...

read more »
You have very spurious evidence of your own credentials
validating numerous FACTS about the cause of the wheel
falling off so it ties in the the psychic being right!
At any rate, it's not verifiable, or reproducible, or
easily observed.
A Zenner Test, you pick one of
CIRCLE
SQUARE
STAR
WAVY LINES

OK picked one yet?  C O N C E N T R A T E...
Herc
Graham, which synonym would you substitute for the word spurious;
false, bogus, fake, forged or counterfeit? Calling me a liar would
have been easier but you were being kind.
I know this will take a leap of faith on your behalf but assuming you
trust my sincerity, we can both agree that it is not verifiable by any
standard of science or that the exact event is not reproducible but it
sure as hell was easily observed.
I think you blinked…
RT
PS I made my pick. Better than that, how about telling me just like
the psychic, what will be coming up next for me? Now make sure this is
something personal not generic and cannot pertain to anyone but me. Do
this and I will have to rethink my position. Trust that I will give
you an honest reply.
PPS No one challenging my Bible Code accusations?  Thought so……

I forgot to ask, in the Zenner test you suggest, the probability of
you getting it right is 25%. A 25% success rate would be good for
that test. Using your math skills, what was the probability of the
psychic getting those two incidents 100% correct? Sharpen your pencil
and get back to me.....

[Graham Cooper]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo

Post by ***@teranews.com
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.
The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.
The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.
Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!
Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.
Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.
So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

I have taken this incident and other cold reading incidents to
different  NG’s and they have reacted just like BJACOBY explains. “…
most "skeptics" simply 
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes
as if a real scientist were 
too dumb to know the difference. And then
as icing on the cake there are 
personal attacks on the sanity of the
witnesses to insure that nobody 
has the balls to press the issue
further.”
Frankly speaking I was expecting much of the same coming here and was
quite surprised that BJACOBY nailed it on the head.  Some things are
just beyond our current physics to explain.
Quantum Theory can account for the random possibility but not for the
repeated accuracy concerning this and I would have to presume other
psychic’s cold readings.  And by cold reading I mean he NEVER asks you
a question. It isn’t the con of those who presume the role of psychic
and proceed to fish for an answer by asking you question after
question before the reading. He would just tell you what was coming up
with almost 100% accuracy.
This in not to suggest that science will never come up with an answer.
It just hasn’t caught up to what the Mystics knew and what this
psychic explained to me in a private consultation.  That being, there
is a thin veil that separates this 3D reality from the astral
dimension. This thin veil is constantly penetrated and the astral
bleeds through so to speak, hence all the reported paranormal events.
In reference to this psychic and his methodology, he explained that he
is able, in trance, to travel out of body to the Akashic Record (a
record of time past, present and PROBABLE FUTURES) view them and
correlate what is coming up next for you based on your previous causes
and effects. He also prefaced this by saying that EVERYTHING is
recorded.
All your thoughts, words and deeds.  I would assume there is some
scientific correlation to this.
Now, who am I to argue with someone who made such an indelible
impression by making actuate predicts that extended 40 years into my
future. They certainly can be debated and  doubted by naysayers but
not dismissed as Graham Cooper suggests and explained away with “Macro
Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.”
Is protecting the current scientific paradigm so important to negate
the obvious?
That being, 3D is NOT all that there is…
RT

BJACOBY is a *motivated* skeptic,
while Vtcapo is a methodologist 'believer'.
A number line analogy.
<--SKEPTICS----BJ-----|----VT---BlindFaith--->
So your direction is the same, from a different approach.
Now to answer BJ's question and stance on REPLICATION..
the answer is:  No Skeptic or Astrologer alike will duplicate a
successful test!
It took me 2 years to get...

read more »
You have very spurious evidence of your own credentials
validating numerous FACTS about the cause of the wheel
falling off so it ties in the the psychic being right!
At any rate, it's not verifiable, or reproducible, or
easily observed.
A Zenner Test, you pick one of
CIRCLE
SQUARE
STAR
WAVY LINES

OK picked one yet?  C O N C E N T R A T E...
Herc
Graham, which synonym would you substitute for the word spurious;
false, bogus, fake, forged or counterfeit? Calling me a liar would
have been easier but you were being kind.
I know this will take a leap of faith on your behalf but assuming you
trust my sincerity, we can both agree that it is not verifiable by any
standard of science or that the exact event is not reproducible but it
sure as hell was easily observed.
I think you blinked…

I have no idea if you're lying or not.

ANYBODY who cites they are qualified in material science as the only
qualifying evidence is making a spurious case.

The point is in Engineering, a hypothetical is only worth discussing
if an experiment can be designed.

* * * *

I can just read your mind outright, I can answer a question you are
THINKING of even better.

BTW I thought of a VERY SIMPLE ACCURATE MEASUREMENT of my Quantum
Entanglement Powers!

Exactly like the final scene of Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy.

I grab 5 random scrabble letters, put them one after the after.

Type the 5 letters into a dictionary, if it's a word... it's a score!

We can use random selections or a control person to work out the
average score.

So.. that's experiment if you're interested.

Though I suggest you let me read your mind.. It's really spot on
considering I do it BLIND!

Odds of a wheel coming off on a particular day = 1 in 1,000,000
Number of people on earth times days lived = 5,000,000,000 X 10,000

It's bound to happen to someone.. and very hard to prove the psychic
didn't hack your axle down!



Herc

[vtcapo]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo

Post by ***@teranews.com
<somebody wrote>

Post by Graham Cooper

Dear Fabrizio,
Please apply your mathematic to the following events. I have a number
of people who would like an answer other than it being otherworldly.
This event was the result of a first encounter with a psychic.  He was
lecturing in an upper floor meeting hall 
in and old building in NYC .
The room was filled with rows of fold up 
chairs 75-100 facing a
raised platform with a podium. An effeminate 
man in his mid thirties
dressed impeccable in a suit and tie walked in 
from a side door
accompanied by an assistant.
When I arrived he was about to commence with a lecture on 
numerology
and the significance of the number 3.  I  hurried to take my seat
never saying a word  and listened. After the lecture was finished
there was a 
short break and you could feel the anticipation in the
packed house as they 
knew what was to happen next.  During the break
idle conversations were heard. I listened and did not speak.
When he returned from an adjoining room he walked up to the first row
and in semi-trance began to tell each person seated, one by one what
was coming up next in their lives.  This was absolutely meaningless
to 
me but by the expressions on peoples faces,  intriguing. Row after
row 
would leave after they got their personal reading with only a
few 
staying on to watch it all.
When he finally got to me he pointed at me with closed eyes and said,
I see an older women who is upset with you.  She is upset over your
work.  You will have  a “to do”,  “words” over your …. Job.  He
turned 
as if to go on to the next person when something drew him back
to me. 
Pointing once again to me, he said, and I see this women upset
over 
another women who is much older than her.  He paused as if he
was 
seeing something…..She fell and broke her arm. That was it .
Around 10:00 or 11:00 PM.  that same evening the phone rings, it is my
mother. She goes off on a rant over the fact that I was quitting my
job. Ira, my boss gave her an ear full saying I was leaving him in a
lurch and my mother of course sided with him and was reprimanding me
about my decision to quit.  But that is not what raised the hairs on
the back of my neck. I was about to end the conversation when my
mother blurts out… and give your grandmother a call. She slipped on
the 
ice, and broke her wrist.
How would you account for the accuracy of the psychics cold reading
mathematically? This in not a trick question but an actual event. I
must stress that I had not spoken before or during the reading and had
no prior knowledge of my grandmother’s accident.
Richard Travisano

Your absent reply suggests you are of the opinnion it cannot be
calculated mathematically and is "other worldly".
Thank you....
RT

And your reply implies what? I don't know.

Post by Graham Cooper
Macro Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.
Chaos theory, events diverge.
Anti-Chaos theory, events converge (symbolically)
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the laws of
probability.

And this reply is even worse! What a meaningless jargon word salad! Just
throw all those bogus terms around and everyone will think how "smart"
you are. What have you really said? Nothing as far as I can see.
The story above exemplifies the problem of physics facing a topic on the
"fringe". Difficult subjects are viewed as best studied by ignoring them
and making fun of them and pretending they don't really exist. There is
even a journal (The Journal of Irreproducible Results) created
specifically to make fun of these topics and insure they are not taken
seriously.
The point as you can see in the story above, has to do with
reproducibility. Science and physics in particular has taken to
demanding that all "facts" be reproducible on command. Sure it's great
that Maxwells equations tested today will be the same as tested tomorrow
and one can count on similar results each time. But is that all there is
to life? Hardly.
Perhaps you've seen me here making this point with satire posts with a
lampooning of Lightening I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!
Anyone who's seen REAL psychic phenomena in action (like the above
story) knows that trying to explain the results by chance or probability
or fraud or other skeptical arguments is simply scientific nonsense.
Ignorance codified as an argument. The probabilities of results being
"luck" are astronomically small. Faced with that, most "skeptics" simply
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes as if a real scientist were
too dumb to know the difference. And then as icing on the cake there are
personal attacks on the sanity of the witnesses to insure that nobody
has the balls to press the issue further.
Obviously all this is the height of anti-science. All of which is made
all them more interesting by the very fact that while traditional
establishment "science" works hard to "debunk" such phenomena, the very
people paying the establishment for their time (government) is also
spending millions (probably much more) to actually investigate practical
applications of the phenomena for spying and other purposes. (remote
viewing) It's obviously all hypocrisy, with politics polluting real
science.
So what is the answer? Well, I suggest some real scientists with actual
interests in these phenomena could start by growing a set of balls.

I have taken this incident and other cold reading incidents to
different  NG’s and they have reacted just like BJACOBY explains. “…
most "skeptics" simply 
withdraw into accusations of lies and hoaxes
as if a real scientist were 
too dumb to know the difference. And then
as icing on the cake there are 
personal attacks on the sanity of the
witnesses to insure that nobody 
has the balls to press the issue
further.”
Frankly speaking I was expecting much of the same coming here and was
quite surprised that BJACOBY nailed it on the head.  Some things are
just beyond our current physics to explain.
Quantum Theory can account for the random possibility but not for the
repeated accuracy concerning this and I would have to presume other
psychic’s cold readings.  And by cold reading I mean he NEVER asks you
a question. It isn’t the con of those who presume the role of psychic
and proceed to fish for an answer by asking you question after
question before the reading. He would just tell you what was coming up
with almost 100% accuracy.
This in not to suggest that science will never come up with an answer.
It just hasn’t caught up to what the Mystics knew and what this
psychic explained to me in a private consultation.  That being, there
is a thin veil that separates this 3D reality from the astral
dimension. This thin veil is constantly penetrated and the astral
bleeds through so to speak, hence all the reported paranormal events.
In reference to this psychic and his methodology, he explained that he
is able, in trance, to travel out of body to the Akashic Record (a
record of time past, present and PROBABLE FUTURES) view them and
correlate what is coming up next for you based on your previous causes
and effects. He also prefaced this by saying that EVERYTHING is
recorded.
All your thoughts, words and deeds.  I would assume there is some
scientific correlation to this.
Now, who am I to argue with someone who made such an indelible
impression by making actuate predicts that extended 40 years into my
future. They certainly can be debated and  doubted by naysayers but
not dismissed as Graham Cooper suggests and explained away with “Macro
Quantum Entanglement is the mechanism for all paranormal,
obviously.”
Is protecting the current scientific paradigm so important to negate
the obvious?
That being, 3D is NOT all that there is…
RT

BJACOBY is a *motivated* skeptic,
while Vtcapo is a methodologist 'believer'.
A number line analogy.
<--SKEPTICS----BJ-----|----VT---BlindFaith--->
So your direction is the same, from a different approach.
Now to answer BJ's question and stance on REPLICATION..
the answer is:  No Skeptic or Astrologer alike will duplicate a
successful test!
It took me 2 years to get...

read more »
You have very spurious evidence of your own credentials
validating numerous FACTS about the cause of the wheel
falling off so it ties in the the psychic being right!
At any rate, it's not verifiable, or reproducible, or
easily observed.
A Zenner Test, you pick one of
CIRCLE
SQUARE
STAR
WAVY LINES

OK picked one yet?  C O N C E N T R A T E...
Herc
Graham, which synonym would you substitute for the word spurious;
false, bogus, fake, forged or counterfeit? Calling me a liar would
have been easier but you were being kind.
I know this will take a leap of faith on your behalf but assuming you
trust my sincerity, we can both agree that it is not verifiable by any
standard of science or that the exact event is not reproducible but it
sure as hell was easily observed.
I think you blinked…

I have no idea if you're lying or not.
ANYBODY who cites they are qualified in material science as the only
qualifying evidence is making a spurious case.
The point is in Engineering, a hypothetical is only worth discussing
if an experiment can be designed.
* * * *
I can just read your mind outright, I can answer a question you are
THINKING of even better.
BTW I thought of a VERY SIMPLE ACCURATE MEASUREMENT of my Quantum
Entanglement Powers!
Exactly like the final scene of Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy.
I grab 5 random scrabble letters, put them one after the after.
Type the 5 letters into a dictionary, if it's a word... it's a score!
We can use random selections or a control person to work out the
average score.
So.. that's experiment if you're interested.
Though I suggest you let me read your mind..  It's really spot on
considering I do it BLIND!
Odds of a wheel coming off on a particular day = 1 in 1,000,000
Number of people on earth times days lived = 5,000,000,000 X 10,000
It's bound to happen to someone.. and very hard to prove the psychic
didn't hack your axle down!
Herc

Graham of course you have no idea if this is all made up but I can
assure you these two incidents and additional ones equally
unexplainable are true to the letter. I wrote these predictions down
and the events as they occurred.

To say the 2nd incident ( forget the 1st , no one can calculate the
probability of that happening) is “bound to happen”, is you reaching
for a rational explanation.

You are suggesting that an effeminate psychic came all the way from
NYC (a 1 hour drive w/o traffic) and hacked the studs to make his
prediction come true? That doesn’t add up. He had a captive
audience. He didn’t have to make me a believer he already had
hundreds. I am sure he didn’t go around town making his predictions
come true.

Some have suggested that Roger hacked off the studs to make me a
believer. That doesn’t hold water either. I was already a believer.

We lived on a commune and money was always in short supply. Although
he got a new axle for a few bucks at the junkyard and we installed it
ourselves he had to cough up the towing bill and had hours of
frustration and inconvenience associated with the incident. Roger was
frugal, actually cheap. The last time I got a nickel from Roger the
balls on the Buffalo were blue. No, that doesn’t play. Besides they
weren’t hacked off, they sheared or snapped off. No hacksaw marks.
Wait a minute…… he used a sledge hammer! Riiiiiiight… NOT!

Post by Graham Cooper
ANYBODY who cites they are qualified in material science >as the only 
qualifying evidence is making a spurious case.
The point is in Engineering, a hypothetical is only worth >discussing 
if an experiment can be designed.

Again you are reaching. I was a 4th year engineering student. If
anyone was “qualified” I was. If I couldn’t determine an obvious case
of stress failure I would have graduated with an SB instead of a BS.
(SB Shit for Brains).

If you were honest with yourself you would only be able to come up
with two conclusions. One, they are totally unexplainable except for
the psychic’s explanation of traveling to the Record or I am making
the whole thing up.

Take your pick.

RT
PS If you could have read my mind you would have known that I still
would like you to tell me what is coming up next for me. Just like the
psychic did….

[Graham Cooper]

Post by vtcapo
the whole thing up.
Take your pick.
RT
PS If you could have read my mind you would have known that I still
would like you to tell me what is coming up next for me. Just like the
psychic did….

There are a million stories no different to yours out there.

I'm not interested in a discussing about trusting a strangers psychic
claims or not with a few usenet posts as evidence!


*****MY TURN****

I can only accurately read your mind if you follow the simple remote-
bibliomancy protocol.

I can read about 10 words per day, whatever your were thinking at the
time when you post on usenet "READ MY MIND NOW"..

If you want to NOT see a demonstration of mind reading, you're going
about it the right way.

If you want to see real mindreading, I need a subject! 10 years of no
takers!

Are you IN our OUT?

Herc

[George152]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo
the whole thing up.
Take your pick.
RT
PS If you could have read my mind you would have known that I still
would like you to tell me what is coming up next for me. Just like the
psychic did….

There are a million stories no different to yours out there.
I'm not interested in a discussing about trusting a strangers psychic
claims or not with a few usenet posts as evidence!
*****MY TURN****
I can only accurately read your mind if you follow the simple remote-
bibliomancy protocol.
I can read about 10 words per day, whatever your were thinking at the
time when you post on usenet "READ MY MIND NOW"..
If you want to NOT see a demonstration of mind reading, you're going
about it the right way.
If you want to see real mindreading, I need a subject! 10 years of no
takers!
Are you IN our OUT?
Herc

Looks like the fruit cake escaped christmas

[Graham Cooper]

Post by George152

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo
the whole thing up.
Take your pick.
RT
PS If you could have read my mind you would have known that I still
would like you to tell me what is coming up next for me. Just like the
psychic did….

There are a million stories no different to yours out there.
I'm not interested in a discussing about trusting a strangers psychic
claims or not with a few usenet posts as evidence!
*****MY TURN****
I can only accurately read your mind if you follow the simple remote-
bibliomancy protocol.
I can read about 10 words per day, whatever your were thinking at the
time when you post on usenet "READ MY MIND NOW"..
If you want to NOT see a demonstration of mind reading, you're going
about it the right way.
If you want to see real mindreading, I need a subject!  10 years of no
takers!
Are you IN our OUT?
Herc

Looks like the fruit cake escaped christmas

Don't any of you skeptics EVER whine again that no replicable evidence
has been put forward for paranormal testing.


Herc

[vtcapo]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo
the whole thing up.
Take your pick.
RT
PS If you could have read my mind you would have known that I still
would like you to tell me what is coming up next for me. Just like the
psychic did….

There are a million stories no different to yours out there.
I'm not interested in a discussing about trusting a strangers psychic
claims or not with a few usenet posts as evidence!
*****MY TURN****
I can only accurately read your mind if you follow the simple remote-
bibliomancy protocol.
I can read about 10 words per day, whatever your were thinking at the
time when you post on usenet "READ MY MIND NOW"..
If you want to NOT see a demonstration of mind reading, you're going
about it the right way.
If you want to see real mindreading, I need a subject!  10 years of no
takers!
Are you IN our OUT?
Herc

Graham, you know why 10 years and no takers? Your,“reading my mind”,
is a total waste of time. It certainly wasted 10 years of yours. Look

Post by Graham Cooper
I can only accurately read your mind if you follow the
simple remote- 
bibliomancy protocol.

Follow the simple remote-bibliomancy protocol? Hum… What protocol did
the psychic follow? Pray tell?

We seem to be too far apart concerning what each of us considers
important. You appear to be interested in parlor games while I am
trying to understand the unexplainable.

Parlor games have been around for a long time. They come in various
forms and that includes the lab. What I am referencing is not a game.
It is about predicting the future with extreme accuracy. It is about
inter dimensional travel that has been demonstrated.

Mathematics should be able to describe this experience. The Bible Code
is a case in point. Whatever the distracters may say, Israel uses it.
You and others should be asking, why?

Gee…I thought that would have perked up some ears here but I guess I’m
in the wrong NG. What a disappointment.

RT
PS George 152? Do you know what George152 means?......... Absolutely
nothing.
Ask George, he should be a good subject… I’m out.

[Graham Cooper]

Post by vtcapo
Ask George, he should be a good subject… I’m out.

No problem mate!

As for BJACOBY comment:

I assert is a hoax because it's not
reproducible at will. Hence just like psychic phenomena it must be
simply a hoax and not exist!

This is clearly not the case as you can see people are not willing to
partake in experiments.

AS STATED:
Now to answer BJ's question and stance on REPLICATION..
the answer is: No Skeptic or Astrologer alike will duplicate a
successful test!

or even a 1st!

Herc

[BruceS]

Post by vtcapo

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo
the whole thing up.
Take your pick.
RT
PS If you could have read my mind you would have known that I still
would like you to tell me what is coming up next for me. Just like the
psychic did….

There are a million stories no different to yours out there.
I'm not interested in a discussing about trusting a strangers psychic
claims or not with a few usenet posts as evidence!
*****MY TURN****
I can only accurately read your mind if you follow the simple remote-
bibliomancy protocol.
I can read about 10 words per day, whatever your were thinking at the
time when you post on usenet "READ MY MIND NOW"..
If you want to NOT see a demonstration of mind reading, you're going
about it the right way.
If you want to see real mindreading, I need a subject!  10 years of no
takers!
Are you IN our OUT?
Herc

Graham, you know why 10 years and no takers? Your,“reading my mind”,
is a total waste of time. It certainly wasted 10 years of yours.  Look

No, vtcapo, you have it wrong. There is no reason for Graham having
no takers, because he *has* in fact had "takers". He just likes to
lie about it, despite the clear history, readily recovered from
Google. He's come up with challenge after challenge, with various
(and often changing midstream) protocols. Various people (I'm one of
them) have agreed to his terms and followed his protocols. Usually,
his test shows him a complete failure, as with his claim to be able to
guess raven1's VIN and coming up with something like "v9". In one
test with me, he did a good bit better than pure chance, but he didn't
want to go ahead with longer odds. Graham likes to do tests where he
has a substantial chance of getting "hits" by chance alone. Even
then, he's had a taker recently in A_B, but Graham chose to drop out
of that test because of something A_B said in an unrelated thread.
<snip>

[vtcapo]

Post by vtcapo

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo
the whole thing up.
Take your pick.
RT
PS If you could have read my mind you would have known that I still
would like you to tell me what is coming up next for me. Just like the
psychic did….

There are a million stories no different to yours out there.
I'm not interested in a discussing about trusting a strangers psychic
claims or not with a few usenet posts as evidence!
*****MY TURN****
I can only accurately read your mind if you follow the simple remote-
bibliomancy protocol.
I can read about 10 words per day, whatever your were thinking at the
time when you post on usenet "READ MY MIND NOW"..
If you want to NOT see a demonstration of mind reading, you're going
about it the right way.
If you want to see real mindreading, I need a subject!  10 years of no
takers!
Are you IN our OUT?
Herc

Graham, you know why 10 years and no takers? Your,“reading my mind”,
is a total waste of time. It certainly wasted 10 years of yours.  Look

No, vtcapo, you have it wrong.  There is no reason for Graham having
no takers, because he *has* in fact had "takers".  He just likes to
lie about it, despite the clear history, readily recovered from
Google.  He's come up with challenge after challenge, with various
(and often changing midstream) protocols.  Various people (I'm one of
them) have agreed to his terms and followed his protocols.  Usually,
his test shows him a complete failure, as with his claim to be able to
guess raven1's VIN and coming up with something like "v9".  In one
test with me, he did a good bit better than pure chance, but he didn't
want to go ahead with longer odds.  Graham likes to do tests where he
has a substantial chance of getting "hits" by chance alone.  Even
then, he's had a taker recently in A_B, but Graham chose to drop out
of that test because of something A_B said in an unrelated thread.
<snip>

So Graham is a con. Go figure? Tell me if I’ve made the correct
adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
truth…

<-Graham-More Bullshit-Bullshit-Skeptics-BJ-|-VT-Faith Based on
Experience-Atheism-Organized Religion-Blind Faith->

RT

[Graham Cooper]

So Graham is a con.  Go figure? Tell me if I’ve made the correct
adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
truth…
<-Graham-More Bullshit-Bullshit-Skeptics-BJ-|-VT-Faith Based on
Experience-Atheism-Organized Religion-Blind Faith->
RT

What is it you want? A gold star or a chest to wear it on?

Notice how me trying to mediate between skeptics and believers with
the goal of designing some experiments we can test online...

resulted in denial and defamation based on the absence of volunteer
testers and story telling!

Herc

[vtcapo]

So Graham is a con.  Go figure? Tell me if I’ve made the correct
adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
truth…
<-Graham-More Bullshit-Bullshit-Skeptics-BJ-|-VT-Faith Based on
Experience-Atheism-Organized Religion-Blind Faith->
RT

What is it you want?  A gold star or a chest to wear it on?
Notice how me trying to mediate between skeptics and believers with
the goal of designing some experiments we can test online...
resulted in denial and defamation based on the absence of volunteer
testers and story telling!
Herc

Graham to be honest, where are we going with this? Your tests will
prove nothing. A true psychic would never participate in these tests
because they have nothing to prove. They are already in the know.

Remote viewing is different. It relies on protocols and is more in
line with your methodology. Although psychics were recruited or should
I say asked to join in remote viewing the best of the best were not
interested. This was the case in the UK and I would suspect in the US
and USSR. Why, because doing the dirty work for the MIC is not
something they wanted recorded in the Aether.

And like I said, or should I say, what the psychic said, everything is
recorded, all your thoughts, words and deeds.

It’s bad Karma.

RT
PS If you get roughed up occasionally it goes with the territory.
Don’t take it personal. I never do. Just brush yourself off and move
on....

[BruceS]

Post by vtcapo

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo
the whole thing up.
Take your pick.
RT
PS If you could have read my mind you would have known that I still
would like you to tell me what is coming up next for me. Just like the
psychic did….

There are a million stories no different to yours out there.
I'm not interested in a discussing about trusting a strangers psychic
claims or not with a few usenet posts as evidence!
*****MY TURN****
I can only accurately read your mind if you follow the simple remote-
bibliomancy protocol.
I can read about 10 words per day, whatever your were thinking at the
time when you post on usenet "READ MY MIND NOW"..
If you want to NOT see a demonstration of mind reading, you're going
about it the right way.
If you want to see real mindreading, I need a subject!  10 years of no
takers!
Are you IN our OUT?
Herc

Graham, you know why 10 years and no takers? Your,“reading my mind”,
is a total waste of time. It certainly wasted 10 years of yours.  Look

No, vtcapo, you have it wrong.  There is no reason for Graham having
no takers, because he *has* in fact had "takers".  He just likes to
lie about it, despite the clear history, readily recovered from
Google.  He's come up with challenge after challenge, with various
(and often changing midstream) protocols.  Various people (I'm one of
them) have agreed to his terms and followed his protocols.  Usually,
his test shows him a complete failure, as with his claim to be able to
guess raven1's VIN and coming up with something like "v9".  In one
test with me, he did a good bit better than pure chance, but he didn't
want to go ahead with longer odds.  Graham likes to do tests where he
has a substantial chance of getting "hits" by chance alone.  Even
then, he's had a taker recently in A_B, but Graham chose to drop out
of that test because of something A_B said in an unrelated thread.
<snip>

So Graham is a con.  Go figure? Tell me if I’ve made the correct
adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
truth…

I wouldn't say he's a con, just that he's extremely deluded, and has
some serious mental problems. He seems to believe in his abilities a
very little bit, and defend that belief violently. On the other hand,
he doesn't believe very much, or he'd be willing to do a test that
isn't all about slightly better than random results. As for the
nature of his magic powers, that seems to change over time. He also
has various and contradictory beliefs in his special nature---he's the
Son of God, Adam of the Bible, Hercules, Truman (from the movie),
etc. Don't try to make sense out of it, as there really is none.
AIUI, he's been diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic, or something to
that effect. He's done time for threatening to poison food---what
would constitute "terrorism" today. He's obsessed with prize-based
contests to prove paranormal abilities, but refuses to follow their
rules, or even come up with anything that repeatably, rationally,
reliably shows any deviation from normal abilities and chance. In
short, he would probably do much better if given the correct
medications.

[Graham Cooper]

Post by BruceS

Post by vtcapo

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by vtcapo
the whole thing up.
Take your pick.
RT
PS If you could have read my mind you would have known that I still
would like you to tell me what is coming up next for me. Just like the
psychic did….

There are a million stories no different to yours out there.
I'm not interested in a discussing about trusting a strangers psychic
claims or not with a few usenet posts as evidence!
*****MY TURN****
I can only accurately read your mind if you follow the simple remote-
bibliomancy protocol.
I can read about 10 words per day, whatever your were thinking at the
time when you post on usenet "READ MY MIND NOW"..
If you want to NOT see a demonstration of mind reading, you're going
about it the right way.
If you want to see real mindreading, I need a subject!  10 years of no
takers!
Are you IN our OUT?
Herc

Graham, you know why 10 years and no takers? Your,“reading my mind”,
is a total waste of time. It certainly wasted 10 years of yours.  Look

No, vtcapo, you have it wrong.  There is no reason for Graham having
no takers, because he *has* in fact had "takers".  He just likes to
lie about it, despite the clear history, readily recovered from
Google.  He's come up with challenge after challenge, with various
(and often changing midstream) protocols.  Various people (I'm one of
them) have agreed to his terms and followed his protocols.  Usually,
his test shows him a complete failure, as with his claim to be able to
guess raven1's VIN and coming up with something like "v9".  In one
test with me, he did a good bit better than pure chance, but he didn't
want to go ahead with longer odds.  Graham likes to do tests where he
has a substantial chance of getting "hits" by chance alone.  Even
then, he's had a taker recently in A_B, but Graham chose to drop out
of that test because of something A_B said in an unrelated thread.
<snip>

So Graham is a con.  Go figure? Tell me if I’ve made the correct
adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
truth…

I wouldn't say he's a con, just that he's extremely deluded, and has
some serious mental problems.  He seems to believe in his abilities a
very little bit, and defend that belief violently.  On the other hand,
he doesn't believe very much, or he'd be willing to do a test that
isn't all about slightly better than random results.  As for the
nature of his magic powers, that seems to change over time.  He also
has various and contradictory beliefs in his special nature---he's the
Son of God, Adam of the Bible, Hercules, Truman (from the movie),
etc.  Don't try to make sense out of it, as there really is none.
AIUI, he's been diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic, or something to
that effect.  He's done time for threatening to poison food---what
would constitute "terrorism" today.  He's obsessed with prize-based
contests to prove paranormal abilities, but refuses to follow their
rules, or even come up with anything that repeatably, rationally,
reliably shows any deviation from normal abilities and chance.  In
short, he would probably do much better if given the correct
medications.

And you simply refused to duplicate a positive result on a simple
telepathy test 2 years ago!

You REFUSE TO DUPLICATE THE RESULT.

You INSIST ON RAISING THE BAR!

THAT'S THE TOPIC!

And I sued Win TV for the defamatory story.

http://AustralianPolice.com




****


You keep claiming to be trying to help the scientific testing process
by slandering me and scaring anybody else from doing a 2 minute proof
of telepathy test!

Bruce = LIAR = CON

Skirts around the real issue that he refuses to do the same test that
I passed!

Herc

[Graham Cooper]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by BruceS
rules, or even come up with anything that repeatably, rationally,
reliably shows any deviation from normal abilities and chance.

Skirts around the real issue that he refuses to do the same test that
I passed!

BruceS thinks that raising the PASS ODDS to 10^GOOGLEPLEX TO 1
(a test he actually designed)

adding 10 more arbitrary constraints, hiding the score, making the
test harder in 10 more ways and changing any part of the protocol he
can, after a successful test trial, is REPLICATING THE RESULT!!!


Herc

[Graham Cooper]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by BruceS
rules, or even come up with anything that repeatably, rationally,
reliably shows any deviation from normal abilities and chance.

Skirts around the real issue that he refuses to do the same test that
I passed!

BruceS thinks that raising the PASS ODDS to 10^GOOGLEPLEX TO 1
(a test he actually designed)
adding 10 more arbitrary constraints, hiding the score, making the
test harder in 10 more ways and changing any part of the protocol he
can, after a successful test trial, is REPLICATING THE RESULT!!!
Herc

He also quotes claims from hypothetical discussions on using the word
'GUESS', i.e. 'guess a number' about 30 times after being told that's
not my claim 30 times!

And all the skeptics cite this bogus sarcastic ratsac line from 2002
as proof of pudding.

A CHARGE MADE BY THE SKEPTICS!!

So what? Skeptics user their INCORPORATED Status to abuse police
power.

http://AustralianPolice.com

[BruceS]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by BruceS
rules, or even come up with anything that repeatably, rationally,
reliably shows any deviation from normal abilities and chance.

Skirts around the real issue that he refuses to do the same test that
I passed!

BruceS thinks that raising the PASS ODDS to 10^GOOGLEPLEX TO 1
(a test he actually designed)

Haha! You're being absurd again, Graham. You didn't need to beat
anywhere near those odds to win money from me in a test I designed.
Admittedly, it wasn't a *lot* of money, but I'm not rich. You refused
to even *try* a real test of your supposed magic powers. All you'll
do is tests where you hope to very slightly beat random chance.

Post by Graham Cooper
adding 10 more arbitrary constraints, hiding the score, making the
test harder in 10 more ways and changing any part of the protocol he
can, after a successful test trial, is REPLICATING THE RESULT!!!

You really need to take your meds.

[Graham Cooper]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by BruceS
rules, or even come up with anything that repeatably, rationally,
reliably shows any deviation from normal abilities and chance.

Skirts around the real issue that he refuses to do the same test that
I passed!

BruceS thinks that raising the PASS ODDS to 10^GOOGLEPLEX TO 1
(a test he actually designed)

Haha!  You're being absurd again, Graham.  You didn't need to beat
anywhere near those odds to win money from me in a test I designed.
Admittedly, it wasn't a *lot* of money, but I'm not rich.  You refused
to even *try* a real test of your supposed magic powers.  All you'll
do is tests where you hope to very slightly beat random chance.

Post by Graham Cooper
adding 10 more arbitrary constraints, hiding the score, making the
test harder in 10 more ways and changing any part of the protocol he
can, after a successful test trial, is REPLICATING THE RESULT!!!

You really need to take your meds.

You need to wake up and read the writing on the wall.

Loading Image...

[BruceS]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by BruceS
rules, or even come up with anything that repeatably, rationally,
reliably shows any deviation from normal abilities and chance.

Skirts around the real issue that he refuses to do the same test that
I passed!

BruceS thinks that raising the PASS ODDS to 10^GOOGLEPLEX TO 1
(a test he actually designed)

Haha!  You're being absurd again, Graham.  You didn't need to beat
anywhere near those odds to win money from me in a test I designed.
Admittedly, it wasn't a *lot* of money, but I'm not rich.  You refused
to even *try* a real test of your supposed magic powers.  All you'll
do is tests where you hope to very slightly beat random chance.

Post by Graham Cooper
adding 10 more arbitrary constraints, hiding the score, making the
test harder in 10 more ways and changing any part of the protocol he
can, after a successful test trial, is REPLICATING THE RESULT!!!

You really need to take your meds.

You need to wake up and read the writing on the wall.

This had me a little concerned, so I checked. Nope. Nobody has been
writing on my walls. The closest things I could find were signitures
on artwork hanging on the walls. What a relief!

Post by Graham Cooper
http://camaffiliate.com/media/KingsBeach.png

Is that a partial goatse? I don't know that I'd be proud of that one.

[Graham Cooper]

Post by Graham Cooper
BruceS thinks that raising the PASS ODDS to 10^GOOGLEPLEX TO 1
(a test he actually designed)

Haha!  You're being absurd again, Graham.  You didn't need to beat
anywhere near those odds to win money from me in a test I designed.

well the first $5 was for only 10 trillion to 1 ODDS!

the full $500 was a Googleplex to 1!!!!

**********


2010 BRUCE LOSES PSYCHIC TEST

BRUCE SPENDS 2 YEARS CARRYING ON

"THOSE ODDS WERE TOOOOOOO SMALLLL!"

***

THEN HE LIES THAT IT'S MY FAULT THAT NO POSITIVE TEST RESULT HAD BEEN
REPLICATED!



HERC

[BruceS]

Post by Graham Cooper

Post by Graham Cooper
BruceS thinks that raising the PASS ODDS to 10^GOOGLEPLEX TO 1
(a test he actually designed)

Haha!  You're being absurd again, Graham.  You didn't need to beat
anywhere near those odds to win money from me in a test I designed.

well the first $5 was for only 10 trillion to 1 ODDS!
the full $500 was a Googleplex to 1!!!!
**********
2010 BRUCE LOSES PSYCHIC TEST
BRUCE SPENDS 2 YEARS CARRYING ON
"THOSE ODDS WERE TOOOOOOO SMALLLL!"
***
THEN HE LIES THAT IT'S MY FAULT THAT NO POSITIVE TEST RESULT HAD BEEN
REPLICATED!

You keep misrepresenting the situation, then whining about how it was
just too hard (iow, how it would take psychic powers) to win the
contest. You didn't even try! If you'd tried the test, and didn't do
well enough to win the minimum ($20, not $5), you *still* could have
had bragging rights if you'd done significantly better than chance.
But there's the problem: you know as well as we do that you would
*not* do significantly better than chance. All your tests are built
on the premise that you'll do very slightly better than chance. If
you had any psychic (or other magic) powers, you'd be more than
willing to do a test that wasn't so chance-based.

[Graham Cooper]

 In one
test with me, he did a good bit better than pure chance, but he didn't
want to go ahead with longer odds.

EXACTLY RIGHT!

This is the answer to BJ's question, why are no positive results ever
duplicated!

When I finally agreed to your 1 month of testing with zero feedback,
an arbitrary choice that you forced on me..

You then refused to follow the stated protocol of 2 trials with no
scoring before the test began.

You needed 30 days testing for significance (while keeping me in the
dark) but 32 days was too much, you bailed from your own high odds
protocol.

Even if I bend over backwards you all use every cheat in the book.

Herc

[BruceS]

Post by Graham Cooper

 In one
test with me, he did a good bit better than pure chance, but he didn't
want to go ahead with longer odds.

EXACTLY RIGHT!
This is the answer to BJ's question, why are no positive results ever
duplicated!
When I finally agreed to your 1 month of testing with zero feedback,
an arbitrary choice that you forced on me..
You then refused to follow the stated protocol of 2 trials with no
scoring before the test began.
You needed 30 days testing for significance (while keeping me in the
dark) but 32 days was too much, you bailed from your own high odds
protocol.
Even if I bend over backwards you all use every cheat in the book.

Graham, I don't know why you say these things, when anyone who cares
can check the archives and easily see the truth. You refuse to do
tests that aren't largely driven by chance, even when there's some
small payout for substantially beating random chance.