Discussion:
a Tesla is a death-trap in a California wildfire
(too old to reply)
Nomen Nescio
2023-03-08 02:02:26 UTC
Permalink
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-08 02:40:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container. I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit longer.
Maybe 2 years. A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+ years.
A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV array,
whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Noddy
2023-03-08 04:22:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container.
Bit more than that. I've had petrol that's been stored for over 2 years
that's been fine. It lasts even longer if you use a fuel stabiliser.

I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit longer.

Diesel storage is about the same as petrol.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Maybe 2 years. A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+ years.
A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV array,
whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Lol :)

You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away from a
disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you happen to
drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year isn't a big deal.
Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the container with fresh fuel
for your escape.

Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises which is
highly unlikely :)
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Peter Jason
2023-03-08 05:00:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container.
Bit more than that. I've had petrol that's been stored for over 2 years
that's been fine. It lasts even longer if you use a fuel stabiliser.
I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit longer.
Diesel storage is about the same as petrol.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Maybe 2 years. A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+ years.
A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV array,
whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Lol :)
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away from a
disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you happen to
drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year isn't a big deal.
Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the container with fresh fuel
for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises which is
highly unlikely :)
In the good old days we would experiment with an old 2-stroke motor
mower, feeding it with all sorts of mixes with petrol, like benzine
carbon tetrachloride, turps, old paint and sump oil.
The carbonTet mix gave a beautiful blue/green flame shooting from the
no-muffler exhaust, while the rest gave voluminous clouds of smoke
from blue to black.
Such fun!
Later during a transport strike we found a mix of lighter fuel & turps
would run a car, albeit erratically.
Xeno
2023-03-08 06:47:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container.
Bit more than that. I've had petrol that's been stored for over 2 years
that's been fine. It lasts even longer if you use a fuel stabiliser.
Petrol storage is temperature dependent. If the tin shed you store it in
regularly gets up to 30C or more, expect your fuel to go off in as
little as three months. Worse if it's been adulterated with *ethanol*.
Then you will *experience* the joys of phase separation.
Post by Noddy
I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit longer.
Of course you are, and you'd be wrong. Diesel will go off in 12 months
on average, same as petrol. Because diesel is a less volatile fuel, it
won't go off because of evaporation of the volatile components like
petrol does. Instead it tends to grow bacteria.

https://www.agro.crs/fuel/detail/prevent-microbial-growth-in-fuel-tanks
Post by Noddy
Diesel storage is about the same as petrol.
In a properly sealed container - about 12 months - for both. But, hang
about, didn't you say in your ignorance that diesel will last a bit
longer? Ah, the joys of watching you contradict yourself.
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Maybe 2 years. A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+
years. A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV
array, whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Lol :)
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away from a
disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you happen to
drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year isn't a big deal.
Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the container with fresh fuel
for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises which is
highly unlikely :)
Been looking at what's been going on around the world lately? Obviously
not. Remember where pretty much most of our fuel comes from - hint, not
more than 22% from local sources. The other 78% comes from other places
in the world. Any disruption to *crude oil shipping* and your fantasy
situation has an extremely high likelihood of occurring.
--
Xeno


Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-08 20:50:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container.
Bit more than that. I've had petrol that's been stored for over 2 years
that's been fine. It lasts even longer if you use a fuel stabiliser.
I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit longer.
Diesel storage is about the same as petrol.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Maybe 2 years. A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+
years. A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV
array, whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Lol :)
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away from a
disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you happen to
drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year isn't a big deal.
Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the container with fresh fuel
for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises which is
highly unlikely :)
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade of sea
freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV owners will be
the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Noddy
2023-03-08 21:11:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away from
a disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you happen to
drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year isn't a big deal.
Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the container with fresh
fuel for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises which
is highly unlikely :)
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade of sea
freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV owners will be
the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
I doubt it.

We still produce oil in this country, and while most of the petrol we
use here is imported we only do so because it's cheaper than making our
own. We could start our own production up and make our own fuel here if
the need arose.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-08 21:14:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away from
a disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you happen
to drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year isn't a big
deal. Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the container with
fresh fuel for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises which
is highly unlikely :)
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade of
sea freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV owners will
be the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
I doubt it.
We still produce oil in this country, and while most of the petrol we
use here is imported we only do so because it's cheaper than making our
own. We could start our own production up and make our own fuel here if
the need arose.
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.

OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough oil
for our needs.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Keithr0
2023-03-08 21:21:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away
from a disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you
happen to drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year isn't
a big deal. Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the container
with fresh fuel for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises
which is highly unlikely :)
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade of
sea freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV owners
will be the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
I doubt it.
We still produce oil in this country, and while most of the petrol we
use here is imported we only do so because it's cheaper than making
our own. We could start our own production up and make our own fuel
here if the need arose.
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough oil
for our needs.
Australia is a very big place to blockade.
--
Clocky on programming 18 Feb 2022
"What, you copy and paste code into a sketch in Arduino, select the
libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program"

Clocky on NASA 18 Mar 2022
"Oh, and btw... if you worked for NASA how is it thay you are seemingly
oblivious to Commodore Amigas used at NASA"
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-08 21:41:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keithr0
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away
from a disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you
happen to drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year
isn't a big deal. Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the
container with fresh fuel for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises
which is highly unlikely :)
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade of
sea freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV owners
will be the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
I doubt it.
We still produce oil in this country, and while most of the petrol we
use here is imported we only do so because it's cheaper than making
our own. We could start our own production up and make our own fuel
here if the need arose.
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough
oil for our needs.
Australia is a very big place to blockade.
**Indeed and China has (or soon will have) the capacity, the will and
the desire to do so. Australia needs to be totally self-sufficient in
energy production as soon as possible. Oil is our biggest problem and we
need to find alternative energy sources very quickly. Make no mistake:
China will neutralise Australia as soon as they think they need to.
Cutting off our oil is a very quick and easy way to fuck us. Oil tankers
move slowly and Chinese aircraft are much faster.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Noddy
2023-03-08 22:37:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Keithr0
Post by Trevor Wilson
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough
oil for our needs.
Australia is a very big place to blockade.
**Indeed and China has (or soon will have) the capacity, the will and
the desire to do so. Australia needs to be totally self-sufficient in
energy production as soon as possible. Oil is our biggest problem and we
China will neutralise Australia as soon as they think they need to.
Cutting off our oil is a very quick and easy way to fuck us. Oil tankers
move slowly and Chinese aircraft are much faster.
China likes to talk tough, but when it comes to putting their words into
action they're not that flash. They're also well aware that any action
they take against us would invariably see them facing action against our
allies which is not something they would look forward to.

We live in difficult times and it would be a fatal flaw to
under-estimate the Chinese, but your pessimistic view is equally wrong
in my opinion.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-08 22:43:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Keithr0
Post by Trevor Wilson
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough
oil for our needs.
Australia is a very big place to blockade.
**Indeed and China has (or soon will have) the capacity, the will and
the desire to do so. Australia needs to be totally self-sufficient in
energy production as soon as possible. Oil is our biggest problem and
we need to find alternative energy sources very quickly. Make no
mistake: China will neutralise Australia as soon as they think they
need to. Cutting off our oil is a very quick and easy way to fuck us.
Oil tankers move slowly and Chinese aircraft are much faster.
China likes to talk tough, but when it comes to putting their words into
action they're not that flash. They're also well aware that any action
they take against us would invariably see them facing action against our
allies which is not something they would look forward to.
**That reliance would be a fatal mistake on our part. Should that
fucking idiot, Trump, be elected as the next POTUS, we will be left on
our own. DeSantis is an unknown factor, but you can bet he would be
happy to sacrifice Australia for votes. Australia MUST be able to be
self-sufficient in both defence and essential commodities.
Post by Noddy
We live in difficult times and it would be a fatal flaw to
under-estimate the Chinese, but your pessimistic view is equally wrong
in my opinion.
**We'll see. The next US election will be critical to China's plans.
Trump will not defend Taiwan and has zero interest in Australia.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Noddy
2023-03-09 01:17:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
China likes to talk tough, but when it comes to putting their words
into action they're not that flash. They're also well aware that any
action they take against us would invariably see them facing action
against our allies which is not something they would look forward to.
**That reliance would be a fatal mistake on our part.
I don't think so. That's why we have military alliances in the first
place :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Should that fucking idiot, Trump, be elected as the next POTUS, we will be left on
our own. DeSantis is an unknown factor, but you can bet he would be
happy to sacrifice Australia for votes. Australia MUST be able to be
self-sufficient in both defence and essential commodities.
Australia will *never* be self sufficient at anything, as we don't have
the population or the wealth to be so. We are a small nation on a very
large island.

As far as the Americans are concerned, I believe Trump's day in the sun
has passed. He's too much of a liability now for the Republican Party to
stand him as a candidate for a second term, and I think "Sleepy Joe's"
days are also numbered. DeSantis will most likely be the next US
President, and while he *is* a relative unknown he doesn't appear to be
anywhere near as hardcore right as Trump is, or have the same
isolationist views.

The other point to consider is that regardless of whomever is in office
in the White house, Australia has far too much value to the Americans
both in terms of investment and strategic importance for them to sit
idly by and see it over run by a hostile country.

America is making waves about China's desires to control Taiwan just so
they're not held to ransom by the Chinese having control over the
world's chip market. In light of that, I can't really see them doing
nothing and letting the Chinese take over one of the world's largest
sources of coal, aluminium, uranium, gold or just about anything else :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
We live in difficult times and it would be a fatal flaw to
under-estimate the Chinese, but your pessimistic view is equally wrong
in my opinion.
**We'll see. The next US election will be critical to China's plans.
Trump will not defend Taiwan and has zero interest in Australia.
Trump won't be the next US President, so it's a non issue.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-09 03:20:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
China likes to talk tough, but when it comes to putting their words
into action they're not that flash. They're also well aware that any
action they take against us would invariably see them facing action
against our allies which is not something they would look forward to.
**That reliance would be a fatal mistake on our part.
I don't think so. That's why we have military alliances in the first
place :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Should that fucking idiot, Trump, be elected as the next POTUS, we
will be left on our own. DeSantis is an unknown factor, but you can
bet he would be happy to sacrifice Australia for votes. Australia MUST
be able to be self-sufficient in both defence and essential commodities.
Australia will *never* be self sufficient at anything, as we don't have
the population or the wealth to be so. We are a small nation on a very
large island.
**Bullshit. As others have stated, we need to make ourselves to be like
a porcupine, in a defensive sense. That would likely mean hosting nukes
on our soil on in subs. Long range missiles, sea mines, drones and drone
subs should all be considered to ensure that China refrains from
attacking or interfering with our trade. We CANNOT rely on the US or
anyone else. To remind you of WWII, the US was quite prepared to
sacrifice Australia to the Japanese, should it have been required. The
US will do so again.
Post by Noddy
As far as the Americans are concerned, I believe Trump's day in the sun
has passed. He's too much of a liability now for the Republican Party to
stand him as a candidate for a second term, and I think "Sleepy Joe's"
days are also numbered. DeSantis will most likely be the next US
President, and while he *is* a relative unknown he doesn't appear to be
anywhere near as hardcore right as Trump is, or have the same
isolationist views.
**DeSantis has been described as 'Trump with a brain'. Which makes him
potentially far more dangerous. DeSantis has no care for Australia. We
need to do far more to enhance our defences and our critical
infrastructure. It has recently been stated that Xi intends to take
Taiwan in 2027. We have FOUR years to get our shit together.
Post by Noddy
The other point to consider is that regardless of whomever is in office
in the White house, Australia has far too much value to the Americans
both in terms of investment and strategic importance for them to sit
idly by and see it over run by a hostile country.
**Nonsense. Americans don't know where Australia is and, apart from our
baristas, they don't care about Australians. Which, of course, means
that their politicians don't care either.

Consider Ukraine: Despite the commitment and bravery of the Ukrainian
people, the US has not committed a single military person to fight in
Ukraine. The US is (rightly) concerned of what retaliation Russia might
unleash on the US if they did. In a few years, China will be a MUCH
bigger worry.
Post by Noddy
America is making waves about China's desires to control Taiwan just so
they're not held to ransom by the Chinese having control over the
world's chip market. In light of that, I can't really see them doing
nothing and letting the Chinese take over one of the world's largest
sources of coal, aluminium, uranium, gold or just about anything else :)
**There is NOTHING in Australia that the US can't find anywhere else.
Except decent coffee. They ain't gonna defend their coffee habit.
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
We live in difficult times and it would be a fatal flaw to
under-estimate the Chinese, but your pessimistic view is equally
wrong in my opinion.
**We'll see. The next US election will be critical to China's plans.
Trump will not defend Taiwan and has zero interest in Australia.
Trump won't be the next US President, so it's a non issue.
**Trump PROBABLY won't be the next POTUS. However, never understimate
the stupidity of the American public. They voted for Reagan, Dubya and
Trump. That speaks volumes for just how dumb Americans are.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Noddy
2023-03-09 04:48:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
**That reliance would be a fatal mistake on our part.
I don't think so. That's why we have military alliances in the first
place :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Should that fucking idiot, Trump, be elected as the next POTUS, we
will be left on our own. DeSantis is an unknown factor, but you can
bet he would be happy to sacrifice Australia for votes. Australia
MUST be able to be self-sufficient in both defence and essential
commodities.
Australia will *never* be self sufficient at anything, as we don't
have the population or the wealth to be so. We are a small nation on a
very large island.
**Bullshit.
Really? We're a country that is geographically almost the same size as
mainland USA, with around 1/13th of the population and an economy around
1/20th of the US. If you don't consider that to be "small" then I'm
fucked if I know how you gauge sizes.
Post by Trevor Wilson
As others have stated, we need to make ourselves to be like
a porcupine, in a defensive sense. That would likely mean hosting nukes
on our soil on in subs. Long range missiles, sea mines, drones and drone
subs should all be considered to ensure that China refrains from
attacking or interfering with our trade.
That is a lovely sentiment Trev, and it would be nice. But we simply do
not have the manpower or the money to be able to do that. Not even close.

How much do you reckon it would cost us to man ourselves with enough
weapons of mass destruction to make the Chinese think twice about
invading us? The Chinese sound like they're ready to take on the
Americans over Taiwan, and if they're not perturbed about the threat of
American military might I can't see *anything* we could ever do here
that would make them change their minds if they ever saw fit to invade us.
Post by Trevor Wilson
We CANNOT rely on the US or anyone else. To remind you of WWII, the US was quite prepared to
sacrifice Australia to the Japanese, should it have been required. The
US will do so again.
Yeah, I don't think so.

You must study different historical sources than I have, as during WWII
the Americans considered Australia to be far too valuable an outpost in
the Pacific region for it to ever fall into Japanese hands, which is why
they sent their fleet to the Coral Sea to defeat the Japanese amphibious
invasion of Port Moresby.

From mid 1942 onwards, Australia was the largest Pacific base the US
had, and there was no way they were ever going to surrender it :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
As far as the Americans are concerned, I believe Trump's day in the
sun has passed. He's too much of a liability now for the Republican
Party to stand him as a candidate for a second term, and I think
"Sleepy Joe's" days are also numbered. DeSantis will most likely be
the next US President, and while he *is* a relative unknown he doesn't
appear to be anywhere near as hardcore right as Trump is, or have the
same isolationist views.
**DeSantis has been described as 'Trump with a brain'. Which makes him
potentially far more dangerous. DeSantis has no care for Australia. We
need to do far more to enhance our defences and our critical
infrastructure. It has recently been stated that Xi intends to take
Taiwan in 2027. We have FOUR years to get our shit together.
Stated by who?

Take such comments with a massive grain of salt. For the last 25 years
the American State Department has been predicting that Indonesia will
invade Australia "within 10 years". Guess what? In that 25 years they've
been wrong twice, and are well on their way to making it a hat-trick.

*IF* the Chinese *were* ever going to invade us, do you honestly think
they'd throw out a projected date so we had time to prepare? :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
The other point to consider is that regardless of whomever is in
office in the White house, Australia has far too much value to the
Americans both in terms of investment and strategic importance for
them to sit idly by and see it over run by a hostile country.
**Nonsense. Americans don't know where Australia is and, apart from our
baristas, they don't care about Australians. Which, of course, means
that their politicians don't care either.
Go back and read what I said a second time and see if it sinks in.
America has far too much strategic investment in this country for it to
ever be lost to the Chinese, or anyone else for that matter. The average
American Joe may not give a flying fuck about us, and the average US
politician may not either. But the joint chiefs, heads of the various
intelligence agencies and the industrial military complex in general
will all recognise the danger of losing this cornerstone of the South
Pacific to the enemy.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Consider Ukraine: Despite the commitment and bravery of the Ukrainian
people, the US has not committed a single military person to fight in
Ukraine. The US is (rightly) concerned of what retaliation Russia might
unleash on the US if they did. In a few years, China will be a MUCH
bigger worry.
America, or anyone else for that matter, isn't sticking their nose into
the Ukrainian affair because it's mostly considered to be a civil war.
Fighting between the Ukrainians and Russians has been going on for
decades, and while it has the potential to get ugly if foreign forces
*do* put boots on the ground against the Russians, the Americans (and
others) are not exactly sitting idly by and doing nothing either.

The US is funding the Ukrainians with cash and military equipment on a
*massive* scale, and while the Russians may not be happy about that
they're not doing too much complaining because that's exactly what
*they* were doing during the Vietnam war. The Russians are getting their
own back and they have to suck that up. They're also well aware that
given the horrendous shit-show they've made of demonstrating how
incapable their military might is against the Ukrainians, they would be
doing all they can to avoid a direct military confrontation with the
Americans who would no doubt kick the absolute fucking snot out of them
on the battlefield.

The threat from Russia is not in the form of a protracted military
engagement, which they would no doubt unquestionably lose, but from a
Nuclear strike. The Americans would be well aware of this, which is why
I suspect that they have the bulk of their ballistic missile submarine
fleet on station within striking range of every Russian target of
importance as we speak.

The Chinese situation is a different ball game. They know that a move
against Taiwan will involve a direct confrontation with the US, and
possibly the UK, and New Zealand, and us.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
America is making waves about China's desires to control Taiwan just
so they're not held to ransom by the Chinese having control over the
world's chip market. In light of that, I can't really see them doing
nothing and letting the Chinese take over one of the world's largest
sources of coal, aluminium, uranium, gold or just about anything else :)
**There is NOTHING in Australia that the US can't find anywhere else.
Except decent coffee. They ain't gonna defend their coffee habit.
Pine Gap is a pretty important part of America's overall intelligence
gathering ability, and I don't expect they'd be all that keen to see it
fall into Chinese hands :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Trump won't be the next US President, so it's a non issue.
**Trump PROBABLY won't be the next POTUS. However, never understimate
the stupidity of the American public. They voted for Reagan, Dubya and
Trump. That speaks volumes for just how dumb Americans are.
The American public can be as stupid as rocks, and a great many are, but
they can't vote for someone who's not an official candidate. I don't
believe Trump will be unless he stands as an independent.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Xeno
2023-03-09 12:30:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
**That reliance would be a fatal mistake on our part.
I don't think so. That's why we have military alliances in the first
place :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Should that fucking idiot, Trump, be elected as the next POTUS, we
will be left on our own. DeSantis is an unknown factor, but you can
bet he would be happy to sacrifice Australia for votes. Australia
MUST be able to be self-sufficient in both defence and essential
commodities.
Australia will *never* be self sufficient at anything, as we don't
have the population or the wealth to be so. We are a small nation on
a very large island.
**Bullshit.
Really? We're a country that is geographically almost the same size as
mainland USA, with around 1/13th of the population and an economy around
1/20th of the US. If you don't consider that to be "small" then I'm
fucked if I know how you gauge sizes.
  > As others have stated, we need to make ourselves to be like
Post by Trevor Wilson
a porcupine, in a defensive sense. That would likely mean hosting
nukes on our soil on in subs. Long range missiles, sea mines, drones
and drone subs should all be considered to ensure that China refrains
from attacking or interfering with our trade.
That is a lovely sentiment Trev, and it would be nice. But we simply do
not have the manpower or the money to be able to do that. Not even close.
How much do you reckon it would cost us to man ourselves with enough
weapons of mass destruction to make the Chinese think twice about
invading us? The Chinese sound like they're ready to take on the
Americans over Taiwan, and if they're not perturbed about the threat of
American military might I can't see *anything* we could ever do here
that would make them change their minds if they ever saw fit to invade us.
Post by Trevor Wilson
We CANNOT rely on the US or anyone else. To remind you of WWII, the US
was quite prepared to sacrifice Australia to the Japanese, should it
have been required. The US will do so again.
Yeah, I don't think so.
You must study different historical sources than I have, as during WWII
the Americans considered Australia to be far too valuable an outpost in
the Pacific region for it to ever fall into Japanese hands, which is why
they sent their fleet to the Coral Sea to defeat the Japanese amphibious
invasion of Port Moresby.
From mid 1942 onwards, Australia was the largest Pacific base the US
had, and there was no way they were ever going to surrender it :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
As far as the Americans are concerned, I believe Trump's day in the
sun has passed. He's too much of a liability now for the Republican
Party to stand him as a candidate for a second term, and I think
"Sleepy Joe's" days are also numbered. DeSantis will most likely be
the next US President, and while he *is* a relative unknown he
doesn't appear to be anywhere near as hardcore right as Trump is, or
have the same isolationist views.
**DeSantis has been described as 'Trump with a brain'. Which makes him
potentially far more dangerous. DeSantis has no care for Australia. We
need to do far more to enhance our defences and our critical
infrastructure. It has recently been stated that Xi intends to take
Taiwan in 2027. We have FOUR years to get our shit together.
Stated by who?
Take such comments with a massive grain of salt. For the last 25 years
the American State Department has been predicting that Indonesia will
invade Australia "within 10 years". Guess what? In that 25 years they've
been wrong twice, and are well on their way to making it a hat-trick.
*IF* the Chinese *were* ever going to invade us, do you honestly think
they'd throw out a projected date so we had time to prepare? :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
The other point to consider is that regardless of whomever is in
office in the White house, Australia has far too much value to the
Americans both in terms of investment and strategic importance for
them to sit idly by and see it over run by a hostile country.
**Nonsense. Americans don't know where Australia is and, apart from
our baristas, they don't care about Australians. Which, of course,
means that their politicians don't care either.
Go back and read what I said a second time and see if it sinks in.
America has far too much strategic investment in this country for it to
ever be lost to the Chinese, or anyone else for that matter. The average
American Joe may not give a flying fuck about us, and the average US
politician may not either. But the joint chiefs, heads of the various
intelligence agencies and the industrial military complex in general
will all recognise the danger of losing this cornerstone of the South
Pacific to the enemy.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Consider Ukraine: Despite the commitment and bravery of the Ukrainian
people, the US has not committed a single military person to fight in
Ukraine. The US is (rightly) concerned of what retaliation Russia
might unleash on the US if they did. In a few years, China will be a
MUCH bigger worry.
America, or anyone else for that matter, isn't sticking their nose into
the Ukrainian affair because it's mostly considered to be a civil war.
You have no clue. The US and NATO have realised that Russia sees its war
in Ukraine as a matter of *existential* survival - and rest assured
Russia will soon no longer exist as a functional country - with or
without the war. The demographics of Russia will see to that. The
Russians and the Ukrainians are the same race of people - Slavs. It's
way more complex than a civil war. Ukraine was a buffer zone, among
others, that inhibited invasion of mother Russia by the invaders from
Europe - ie. Napoleon, Hitler. Russia wants its buffer zones back and,
with it, the Soviet Union.

The US and NATO looked at how the Russians fared on the first few days
of the war back in February 2022 and saw that Russia could no longer
fight a conventional war - then realised that if the US and NATO put
troops on the ground, Russia would be backed into a corner and would
bring out the heaviest shit they have at hand - and that would be nukes.
Desperate countries do that you know. So Ukraine has to fight this war
on the ground themselves with generally only logistics and MI support -
no US or NATO boots on the ground. So far so good.
Post by Noddy
Fighting between the Ukrainians and Russians has been going on for
decades, and while it has the potential to get ugly if foreign forces
Mainly from 2011 and 2014 when Russia no longer obeyed treaties it
signed between themselves and Ukraine.
Post by Noddy
*do* put boots on the ground against the Russians, the Americans (and
others) are not exactly sitting idly by and doing nothing either.
The US is funding the Ukrainians with cash and military equipment on a
*massive* scale, and while the Russians may not be happy about that
they're not doing too much complaining because that's exactly what
*they* were doing during the Vietnam war. The Russians are getting their
own back and they have to suck that up. They're also well aware that
given the horrendous shit-show they've made of demonstrating how
incapable their military might is against the Ukrainians, they would be
doing all they can to avoid a direct military confrontation with the
Americans who would no doubt kick the absolute fucking snot out of them
on the battlefield.
The US knows this, as does NATO, and it also knows nukes would be
instantly on the table.
Post by Noddy
The threat from Russia is not in the form of a protracted military
engagement, which they would no doubt unquestionably lose, but from a
Nuclear strike. The Americans would be well aware of this, which is why
I suspect that they have the bulk of their ballistic missile submarine
fleet on station within striking range of every Russian target of
importance as we speak.
The Chinese situation is a different ball game. They know that a move
against Taiwan will involve a direct confrontation with the US, and
possibly the UK, and New Zealand,  and us.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
America is making waves about China's desires to control Taiwan just
so they're not held to ransom by the Chinese having control over the
world's chip market. In light of that, I can't really see them doing
nothing and letting the Chinese take over one of the world's largest
sources of coal, aluminium, uranium, gold or just about anything else :)
**There is NOTHING in Australia that the US can't find anywhere else.
Except decent coffee. They ain't gonna defend their coffee habit.
Pine Gap is a pretty important part of America's overall intelligence
gathering ability, and I don't expect they'd be all that keen to see it
fall into Chinese hands :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Trump won't be the next US President, so it's a non issue.
**Trump PROBABLY won't be the next POTUS. However, never understimate
the stupidity of the American public. They voted for Reagan, Dubya and
Trump. That speaks volumes for just how dumb Americans are.
The American public can be as stupid as rocks, and a great many are, but
they can't vote for someone who's not an official candidate. I don't
believe Trump will be unless he stands as an independent.
--
Xeno


Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
Daryl
2023-03-08 23:56:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Keithr0
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away
from a disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you
happen to drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year
isn't a big deal. Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the
container with fresh fuel for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises
which is highly unlikely :)
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade
of sea freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV
owners will be the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
I doubt it.
We still produce oil in this country, and while most of the petrol
we use here is imported we only do so because it's cheaper than
making our own. We could start our own production up and make our
own fuel here if the need arose.
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough
oil for our needs.
Australia is a very big place to blockade.
**Indeed and China has (or soon will have) the capacity, the will and
the desire to do so. Australia needs to be totally self-sufficient in
energy production as soon as possible. Oil is our biggest problem and we
China will neutralise Australia as soon as they think they need to.
Cutting off our oil is a very quick and easy way to fuck us. Oil tankers
move slowly and Chinese aircraft are much faster.
You are missing one thing, trade goes 2 ways and China desperately needs
our coal and other minerals such as lithium and iron ore, if they were
to block our fuel imports then they wouldn't be getting any of our
exports so it would cause them more problems than it would cause us.
Whilst it may cause us pain to not have fuel imports we will adapt but
the Chinese would be screwing themselves so the chances of it happening
are very very slim.
--
Daryl
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-09 00:18:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Keithr0
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away
from a disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you
happen to drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year
isn't a big deal. Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the
container with fresh fuel for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises
which is highly unlikely :)
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade
of sea freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV
owners will be the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
I doubt it.
We still produce oil in this country, and while most of the petrol
we use here is imported we only do so because it's cheaper than
making our own. We could start our own production up and make our
own fuel here if the need arose.
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough
oil for our needs.
Australia is a very big place to blockade.
**Indeed and China has (or soon will have) the capacity, the will and
the desire to do so. Australia needs to be totally self-sufficient in
energy production as soon as possible. Oil is our biggest problem and
we need to find alternative energy sources very quickly. Make no
mistake: China will neutralise Australia as soon as they think they
need to. Cutting off our oil is a very quick and easy way to fuck us.
Oil tankers move slowly and Chinese aircraft are much faster.
You are missing one thing, trade goes 2 ways and China desperately needs
our coal and other minerals such as lithium and iron ore, if they were
to block our fuel imports then they wouldn't be getting any of our
exports so it would cause them more problems than it would cause us.
**No, it would not. They have their own (inferior, but usable) coal. As
do other places. And one of the biggest is Russia. China has not and
will not cut ties with Russia. The biggest known lithium deposits are in
Chile. Followed by China and most recently, Iran. China owns a very
large chunk of the company which mines lithium in Chile. China is
readying itself for a divorce from Australia. Iron ore is available from
a number of sources. China doesn't need Australia as much as you
imagine. We are just cheap(er).
Post by Daryl
Whilst it may cause us pain to not have fuel imports we will adapt but
the Chinese would be screwing themselves so the chances of it happening
are very very slim.
**China won't be screwing itself. China is playing the long game. We
aren't. Australia is, as usual, looking very short term.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Noddy
2023-03-09 01:40:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
Whilst it may cause us pain to not have fuel imports we will adapt but
the Chinese would be screwing themselves so the chances of it
happening are very very slim.
**China won't be screwing itself. China is playing the long game. We
aren't. Australia is, as usual, looking very short term.
Of *course* they'd be screwing themselves. Right in the arse from a 20
foot run up with no lube.

Just because they're a communist/socialist state country doesn't mean
they're any less reliant on a viable economy as much as anyone else. In
fact their need to export in order to survive has become enormous in the
last 20 years, and if that were suddenly taken away their economy would
collapse and along with it their power.

Despite their sabre rattling to the contrary....
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Daryl
2023-03-09 02:30:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
Whilst it may cause us pain to not have fuel imports we will adapt
but the Chinese would be screwing themselves so the chances of it
happening are very very slim.
**China won't be screwing itself. China is playing the long game. We
aren't. Australia is, as usual, looking very short term.
Of *course* they'd be screwing themselves. Right in the arse from a 20
foot run up with no lube.
Just because they're a communist/socialist state country doesn't mean
they're any less reliant on a viable economy as much as anyone else. In
fact their need to export in order to survive has become enormous in the
last 20 years, and if that were suddenly taken away their economy would
collapse and along with it their power.
Despite their sabre rattling to the contrary....
A large well equipped military is very very expensive, if economy goes
downhill with it goes the ability to support a large military, they may
still be able to afford to have lots of military personnel but large
numbers of ships and planes won't be of much use if they can't afford to
use them.
--
Daryl
Noddy
2023-03-09 04:02:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl
Post by Noddy
Just because they're a communist/socialist state country doesn't mean
they're any less reliant on a viable economy as much as anyone else.
In fact their need to export in order to survive has become enormous
in the last 20 years, and if that were suddenly taken away their
economy would collapse and along with it their power.
Despite their sabre rattling to the contrary....
A large well equipped military is very very expensive, if economy goes
downhill with it goes the ability to support a large military, they may
still be able to afford to have lots of military personnel but large
numbers of ships and planes won't be of much use if they can't afford to
use them.
I don't imagine they can afford to do a lot of what they claim they're
capable of now, but then you're talking about a country that locks their
people into their own homes and welds the doors shut. This is a
totalitarian regime that, for the most part, survives on the fear they
instil into their populace. Financial constraints obviously play a role,
but the fear of being put to death for "Treason" is also a significant
motivating factor in their people's willingness to tow the party line.

For the most part I think the average Chinese couldn't give a flying
fuck about their government and wish they would just go away, and it's
clear from what's happening in Hong Kong that Chinese government policy
is *not* very welcome outside of China.

China needs to look at what happened to the former Soviet Union as a
great example of how state run "muscle flexing" doesn't work, and if
they're not careful they'll end up going broke and collapsing just like
the Soviets did.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Daryl
2023-03-09 06:01:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Daryl
Post by Noddy
Just because they're a communist/socialist state country doesn't mean
they're any less reliant on a viable economy as much as anyone else.
In fact their need to export in order to survive has become enormous
in the last 20 years, and if that were suddenly taken away their
economy would collapse and along with it their power.
Despite their sabre rattling to the contrary....
A large well equipped military is very very expensive, if economy goes
downhill with it goes the ability to support a large military, they
may still be able to afford to have lots of military personnel but
large numbers of ships and planes won't be of much use if they can't
afford to use them.
I don't imagine they can afford to do a lot of what they claim they're
capable of now, but then you're talking about a country that locks their
people into their own homes and welds the doors shut. This is a
totalitarian regime that, for the most part, survives on the fear they
instil into their populace. Financial constraints obviously play a role,
but the fear of being put to death for "Treason" is also a significant
motivating factor in their people's willingness to tow the party line.
For the most part I think the average Chinese couldn't give a flying
fuck about their government and wish they would just go away, and it's
clear from what's happening in Hong Kong that Chinese government policy
is *not* very welcome outside of China.
China needs to look at what happened to the former Soviet Union as a
great example of how state run "muscle flexing" doesn't work, and if
they're not careful they'll end up going broke and collapsing just like
the Soviets did.
Our biggest defence is that we are a long way from anywhere so any
invasion of Australia is going to be very costly and will require a lot
of logistics, getting boots on the ground and keeping them supplied will
never be easy and it will be very costly.
I think Trev is being overly pessimistic, I can't think of a single
reason why the Chinese would want to invade us, its a lot cheaper to buy
resources such as iron ore than to invade and take it.
If there is a war over Taiwan and we support the US Australia will be
the least of their worries when the US has the ability to turn the whole
of China into a smoldering wasteland in a very short time, they
certainly have the capability.
I find it very unlikely that something that major will ever happen when
there can be no winners, everyone will loose and even the Chinese can
see that.
--
Daryl
Noddy
2023-03-08 22:34:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keithr0
Post by Trevor Wilson
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough
oil for our needs.
Australia is a very big place to blockade.
It is.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Noddy
2023-03-08 22:33:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade of
sea freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV owners
will be the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
I doubt it.
We still produce oil in this country, and while most of the petrol we
use here is imported we only do so because it's cheaper than making
our own. We could start our own production up and make our own fuel
here if the need arose.
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.
Yeah, I don't think so.
Post by Trevor Wilson
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough oil
for our needs.
No, we don't, but we are capable of producing roughly one third of our
current daily needs from our own domestic supplies. That means that fuel
would become limited, and certainly much more expensive, but we wouldn't
be left without it.

This country got through WWII with fuel rationing, and if we had to do
something like that again we could.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-08 22:47:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade of
sea freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV owners
will be the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
I doubt it.
We still produce oil in this country, and while most of the petrol we
use here is imported we only do so because it's cheaper than making
our own. We could start our own production up and make our own fuel
here if the need arose.
**The pitifully small amount of oil we produce will go straight to
emergency services and defence. Consumers will not get a single drop.
Yeah, I don't think so.
Post by Trevor Wilson
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough
oil for our needs.
No, we don't, but we are capable of producing roughly one third of our
current daily needs from our own domestic supplies. That means that fuel
would become limited, and certainly much more expensive, but we wouldn't
be left without it.
This country got through WWII with fuel rationing, and if we had to do
something like that again we could.
**I knew someone would bring up WWII. Australia's population was MUCH
smaller and MUCH, MUCH, MUCH less reliant on fossil fuels back then. We
were desperate enough to make oil from shale deposits (very, VERY
expensively). The comparisons with how things were 80 years ago and
completely irrelevant.

Make no mistake: ALL available oil will be dedicated to essential
services and the military.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Noddy
2023-03-09 01:01:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough
oil for our needs.
No, we don't, but we are capable of producing roughly one third of our
current daily needs from our own domestic supplies. That means that
fuel would become limited, and certainly much more expensive, but we
wouldn't be left without it.
This country got through WWII with fuel rationing, and if we had to do
something like that again we could.
**I knew someone would bring up WWII. Australia's population was MUCH
smaller and MUCH, MUCH, MUCH less reliant on fossil fuels back then. We
were desperate enough to make oil from shale deposits (very, VERY
expensively). The comparisons with how things were 80 years ago and
completely irrelevant.
Not in the slightest.

It's relative. We were using far less fuel back then, but we were also
producing far less as well. We've had rationing before, and if we had to
resort to those days again we would. look at the Covid restricted world
we've just emerged from for example. 5 years ago had you told anyone
that we would have a world wide pandemic that would see us all be locked
down like rats in our own homes people would have thought you were a
complete nutbag and moved to have you committed. Yet there we all were
doing exactly what we needed to do in order to get by.

It's not something that we've never done before, or are incapable of
ever doing again.

It's that simple....
Post by Trevor Wilson
Make no mistake: ALL available oil will be dedicated to essential
services and the military.
The only "mistake" being made here is your overly simplistic view on how
you perceive things would play out in such as scenario in my opinion.

In the first instance, the ability of the Chinese to completely surround
and cut off this country from the outside world are absolutely zero. We
have one of the biggest unbroken coastlines in the world, and as
powerful as the Chinese military may be putting an impenetrable "wall"
all the way around this country is entirely beyond their ability. This
isn't Taiwan we're talking about here.

Secondly, our ability to produce our own fuels, both fossil and
synthetic, has never been adequately tested. We've relied heavily on
imports purely for economic reasons, but that doesn't mean we're not
capable of producing our own fuels should the need arise. I doubt that
we'd be able to meet our current requirements, but I also doubt we'd be
unable to produce enough to get by with restrictions.

In other words, I don't believe your "end of the world as we know it"
predictions are anywhere near as accurate as you like to think they are.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-09 03:07:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
OTOH: We can produce plenty of electricity. We can't produce enough
oil for our needs.
No, we don't, but we are capable of producing roughly one third of
our current daily needs from our own domestic supplies. That means
that fuel would become limited, and certainly much more expensive,
but we wouldn't be left without it.
This country got through WWII with fuel rationing, and if we had to
do something like that again we could.
**I knew someone would bring up WWII. Australia's population was MUCH
smaller and MUCH, MUCH, MUCH less reliant on fossil fuels back then.
We were desperate enough to make oil from shale deposits (very, VERY
expensively). The comparisons with how things were 80 years ago and
completely irrelevant.
Not in the slightest.
It's relative. We were using far less fuel back then, but we were also
producing far less as well. We've had rationing before, and if we had to
resort to those days again we would. look at the Covid restricted world
we've just emerged from for example. 5 years ago had you told anyone
that we would have a world wide pandemic that would see us all be locked
down like rats in our own homes people would have thought you were a
complete nutbag and moved to have you committed. Yet there we all were
doing exactly what we needed to do in order to get by.
It's not something that we've never done before, or are incapable of
ever doing again.
It's that simple....
Post by Trevor Wilson
Make no mistake: ALL available oil will be dedicated to essential
services and the military.
The only "mistake" being made here is your overly simplistic view on how
you perceive things would play out in such as scenario in my opinion.
In the first instance, the ability of the Chinese to completely surround
and cut off this country from the outside world are absolutely zero. We
have one of the biggest unbroken coastlines in the world, and as
powerful as the Chinese military may be putting an impenetrable "wall"
all the way around this country is entirely beyond their ability. This
isn't Taiwan we're talking about here.
**How many places can an oil tanker disgorge it's cargo in Australia?

Do you honestly imagine that China cannot track oil tankers bound for
Australia?

If China tells a tanker to turn around, do you imagine that the tanker
operator will not comply?

I'll say again: Tankers are big, slow and easy to track. China can very
easily cut off our supply of oil. And I believe it very likely will,
unless there is a change of leadership in China.
Post by Noddy
Secondly, our ability to produce our own fuels, both fossil and
synthetic, has never been adequately tested. We've relied heavily on
imports purely for economic reasons, but that doesn't mean we're not
capable of producing our own fuels should the need arise. I doubt that
we'd be able to meet our current requirements, but I also doubt we'd be
unable to produce enough to get by with restrictions.
**AFAIK, we have two oil refineries left.
Post by Noddy
In other words, I don't believe your "end of the world as we know it"
predictions are anywhere near as accurate as you like to think they are.
**We'll see. When the Republicans take office in the US, we'll be fucked.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Noddy
2023-03-09 04:59:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
In the first instance, the ability of the Chinese to completely
surround and cut off this country from the outside world are
absolutely zero. We have one of the biggest unbroken coastlines in the
world, and as powerful as the Chinese military may be putting an
impenetrable "wall" all the way around this country is entirely beyond
their ability. This isn't Taiwan we're talking about here.
**How many places can an oil tanker disgorge it's cargo in Australia?
There's a few, but they're all a long way from China :)
Post by Trevor Wilson
Do you honestly imagine that China cannot track oil tankers bound for
Australia?
They can track them, sure. A 10 year old kid with internet access can
track a ship anywhere in the world.
Post by Trevor Wilson
If China tells a tanker to turn around, do you imagine that the tanker
operator will not comply?
That depends. What's China threatening to do if they don't? Sink the
vessel? What kind of international turmoil do you think the Chinese
sinking an unarmed merchant vessel would cause?
Post by Trevor Wilson
I'll say again: Tankers are big, slow and easy to track.
So what?

China can very
Post by Trevor Wilson
easily cut off our supply of oil. And I believe it very likely will,
unless there is a change of leadership in China.
And how exactly are they going to do that? They have no authority in
international waters, so the *only* way they could enforce a blockade
would be by military means which would be in breech of every
international law in the book and turn many countries against them.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Secondly, our ability to produce our own fuels, both fossil and
synthetic, has never been adequately tested. We've relied heavily on
imports purely for economic reasons, but that doesn't mean we're not
capable of producing our own fuels should the need arise. I doubt that
we'd be able to meet our current requirements, but I also doubt we'd
be unable to produce enough to get by with restrictions.
**AFAIK, we have two oil refineries left.
Again, so what? There is nothing preventing us from building more if we
need them, and even with those two we *still* produce around a third of
our daily demand.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
In other words, I don't believe your "end of the world as we know it"
predictions are anywhere near as accurate as you like to think they are.
**We'll see. When the Republicans take office in the US, we'll be fucked.
You watch too many movies :)
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Keithr0
2023-03-09 06:27:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
If China tells a tanker to turn around, do you imagine that the tanker
operator will not comply?
I'll say again: Tankers are big, slow and easy to track. China can very
easily cut off our supply of oil. And I believe it very likely will,
unless there is a change of leadership in China.
Head south by southwest from the gulf until you are 32 degrees south,
then turn west and you are at Freemantle. A little further south before
you turn west and you get to Melbourne. The Indian ocean is very large
and a long way from China.

I'm sure that the Chinese government realise that a war with the west
will wreck their economy and there are nations like India, Thailand, and
Vietnam who would love to take on the production that China does today.
--
Clocky on programming 18 Feb 2022
"What, you copy and paste code into a sketch in Arduino, select the
libraries to include, modify it a bit and hit program"

Clocky on NASA 18 Mar 2022
"Oh, and btw... if you worked for NASA how is it thay you are seemingly
oblivious to Commodore Amigas used at NASA"
Noddy
2023-03-09 09:19:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keithr0
Post by Trevor Wilson
If China tells a tanker to turn around, do you imagine that the tanker
operator will not comply?
I'll say again: Tankers are big, slow and easy to track. China can
very easily cut off our supply of oil. And I believe it very likely
will, unless there is a change of leadership in China.
Head south by southwest from the gulf until you are 32 degrees south,
then turn west and you are at Freemantle. A little further south before
you turn west and you get to Melbourne. The Indian ocean is very large
and a long way from China.
I'm sure that the Chinese government realise that a war with the west
will wreck their economy and there are nations like India, Thailand, and
Vietnam who would love to take on the production that China does today.
The recent "affront" China has faced over calls for an enquiry into the
origins of Covid have already had people looking in that direction.
Within 10 years I expect India will emerge as a new manufacturing giant
as multi nationals look to their welcoming arms and endless supply of
cheap labour as they get sick of dealing with the arrogance of the Chinese.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Daryl
2023-03-09 11:59:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Keithr0
Post by Trevor Wilson
If China tells a tanker to turn around, do you imagine that the
tanker operator will not comply?
I'll say again: Tankers are big, slow and easy to track. China can
very easily cut off our supply of oil. And I believe it very likely
will, unless there is a change of leadership in China.
Head south by southwest from the gulf until you are 32 degrees south,
then turn west and you are at Freemantle. A little further south
before you turn west and you get to Melbourne. The Indian ocean is
very large and a long way from China.
I'm sure that the Chinese government realise that a war with the west
will wreck their economy and there are nations like India, Thailand,
and Vietnam who would love to take on the production that China does
today.
The recent "affront" China has faced over calls for an enquiry into the
origins of Covid have already had people looking in that direction.
Within 10 years I expect India will emerge as a new manufacturing giant
as multi nationals look to their welcoming arms and endless supply of
cheap labour as they get sick of dealing with the arrogance of the Chinese.
Our Prime Minister and many others are in India at the moment for pretty
much the reasons you just said so hopefully India does eventually
replace most of our trade with China.
--
Daryl
Noddy
2023-03-10 01:42:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl
Post by Noddy
The recent "affront" China has faced over calls for an enquiry into
the origins of Covid have already had people looking in that
direction. Within 10 years I expect India will emerge as a new
manufacturing giant as multi nationals look to their welcoming arms
and endless supply of cheap labour as they get sick of dealing with
the arrogance of the Chinese.
Our Prime Minister and many others are in India at the moment for pretty
much the reasons you just said so hopefully India does eventually
replace most of our trade with China.
Yeah, I think the Chinese need to be really careful. They see themselves
as being this unassailable manufacturing giant that can be as fucking
arrogant as they like in the belief that the world has no choice but to
deal with them on whatever terms they see fit to demand.

That may be so in the short term, but they fail to appreciate that
they're not the only country on the planet with an abundance of cheap
labour and if they keep pissing the rest of the world off as they seem
hell bent on doing then the rest of the world will just pack up and take
their business somewhere else.

China needs to bear in mind that it was foreign multinationals looking
to exploit cheap labour that made them what they are today, and there is
absolutely nothing stopping that process being repeated in other parts
of the world....
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Daryl
2023-03-10 02:53:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
Post by Daryl
Post by Noddy
The recent "affront" China has faced over calls for an enquiry into
the origins of Covid have already had people looking in that
direction. Within 10 years I expect India will emerge as a new
manufacturing giant as multi nationals look to their welcoming arms
and endless supply of cheap labour as they get sick of dealing with
the arrogance of the Chinese.
Our Prime Minister and many others are in India at the moment for
pretty much the reasons you just said so hopefully India does
eventually replace most of our trade with China.
Yeah, I think the Chinese need to be really careful. They see themselves
as being this unassailable manufacturing giant that can be as fucking
arrogant as they like in the belief that the world has no choice but to
deal with them on whatever terms they see fit to demand.
That may be so in the short term, but they fail to appreciate that
they're not the only country on the planet with an abundance of cheap
labour and if they keep pissing the rest of the world off as they seem
hell bent on doing then the rest of the world will just pack up and take
their business somewhere else.
China needs to bear in mind that it was foreign multinationals looking
to exploit cheap labour that made them what they are today, and there is
absolutely nothing stopping that process being repeated in other parts
of the world....
Agree and the sooner it happens all the better.
India should also be a lot easier to deal with, they are a democratic
country with the same Westminster system as ours, certainly don't think
it will be totally easy without any issues but a lot easier going than
China.
--
Daryl
Noddy
2023-03-10 03:32:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl
Post by Noddy
Post by Daryl
Post by Noddy
The recent "affront" China has faced over calls for an enquiry into
the origins of Covid have already had people looking in that
direction. Within 10 years I expect India will emerge as a new
manufacturing giant as multi nationals look to their welcoming arms
and endless supply of cheap labour as they get sick of dealing with
the arrogance of the Chinese.
Our Prime Minister and many others are in India at the moment for
pretty much the reasons you just said so hopefully India does
eventually replace most of our trade with China.
Yeah, I think the Chinese need to be really careful. They see
themselves as being this unassailable manufacturing giant that can be
as fucking arrogant as they like in the belief that the world has no
choice but to deal with them on whatever terms they see fit to demand.
That may be so in the short term, but they fail to appreciate that
they're not the only country on the planet with an abundance of cheap
labour and if they keep pissing the rest of the world off as they seem
hell bent on doing then the rest of the world will just pack up and
take their business somewhere else.
China needs to bear in mind that it was foreign multinationals looking
to exploit cheap labour that made them what they are today, and there
is absolutely nothing stopping that process being repeated in other
parts of the world....
Agree and the sooner it happens all the better.
Absolutely. Fuck China and everything it stands for as far as I'm
concerned.
Post by Daryl
India should also be a lot easier to deal with, they are a democratic
country with the same Westminster system as ours, certainly don't think
it will be totally easy without any issues but a lot easier going than
China.
Yep. The transition would take some time, and I'm not sure that you or I
will live long enough to see it effectively implemented, but it would
definitely be a positive move and one that would provide for a far more
stable future than what we have now.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Daryl
2023-03-08 23:48:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Noddy
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container.
Bit more than that. I've had petrol that's been stored for over 2
years that's been fine. It lasts even longer if you use a fuel
stabiliser.
I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit longer.
Diesel storage is about the same as petrol.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Maybe 2 years. A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+
years. A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar
PV array, whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Lol :)
You live in a strange fantasy world. You can get far enough away from
a disaster on a jerry can of fuel regardless of whatever you happen to
drive, and refilling it to keep it fresh once a year isn't a big deal.
Use the old fuel in your mower and refill the container with fresh
fuel for your escape.
Assuming, of course, this kind of fantasy situation ever arises which
is highly unlikely :)
**You could substitute 'zombie apocalypse' for a Chinese blockade of sea
freight to and from Australia. When/if that occurs, EV owners will be
the only vehicles travelling anywhere.
Doubt that, we do have oil but we import because ours isn't economically
viable, if we had no choice to use our own it could be done despite it
being expensive.
It would also take time to become available so there might be short term
supply issues.
--
Daryl
alvey
2023-03-08 23:58:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Noddy
You live in a strange fantasy world.
O the irony...
Xeno
2023-03-09 01:46:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by alvey
Post by Noddy
You live in a strange fantasy world.
O the irony...
Indeed it is!
--
Xeno


Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
Daryl
2023-03-08 05:08:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container. I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit longer.
Maybe 2 years.
Depends on how its stored, diesel needs to be sealed without any air and
then it will last a very long time, I've also used petrol that was 5yrs
old without a problem but its variable.

A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+ years.

A rather wild guess, batteries can last a long time if stored correctly
but 10yrs is a more realistic guess.
Post by Trevor Wilson
A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV array,
whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Certainly possible to charge an EV from solar but EV's need lots and
lots of power so it could take a very long time to fully charge unless
you have a very big solar system.
The sort of portable solar panels that a survivalist could carry in a
vehicle would take weeks to charge an EV.
--
Daryl
Computer Nerd Kev
2023-03-08 09:40:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl
Certainly possible to charge an EV from solar but EV's need lots and
lots of power so it could take a very long time to fully charge unless
you have a very big solar system.
The sort of portable solar panels that a survivalist could carry in a
vehicle would take weeks to charge an EV.
Musk can steal a nuclear electricity generator from a space mission
that his SpaceX company was commissioned to launch prior to the
apocalypse, strap it to the back of his EV, and drive on forever.
--
__ __
#_ < |\| |< _#
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-08 22:02:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container. I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit longer.
Maybe 2 years.
Depends on how its stored, diesel needs to be sealed without any air and
then it will last a very long time, I've also used petrol that was 5yrs
old without a problem but its variable.
 A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+ years.
A rather wild guess, batteries can last a long time if stored correctly
but 10yrs is a more realistic guess.
**Which is WAY longer than oil.
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV array,
whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Certainly possible to charge an EV from solar but EV's need lots and
lots of power so it could take a very long time to fully charge unless
you have a very big solar system.
The sort of portable solar panels that a survivalist could carry in a
vehicle would take weeks to charge an EV.
**When China blockades Australian sea lanes, we will have no oil. What
will we run our cars on?
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Daryl
2023-03-09 00:08:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container. I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit longer.
Maybe 2 years.
Depends on how its stored, diesel needs to be sealed without any air
and then it will last a very long time, I've also used petrol that was
5yrs old without a problem but its variable.
  A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+ years.
A rather wild guess, batteries can last a long time if stored
correctly but 10yrs is a more realistic guess.
**Which is WAY longer than oil.
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV
array, whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Certainly possible to charge an EV from solar but EV's need lots and
lots of power so it could take a very long time to fully charge unless
you have a very big solar system.
The sort of portable solar panels that a survivalist could carry in a
vehicle would take weeks to charge an EV.
**When China blockades Australian sea lanes, we will have no oil. What
will we run our cars on?
If we are forced to use electric cars most of the power will have to
come from coal or gas since almost all solar panels are made in China
which is rather ironic.
If there is a positive to electric cars its that we won't need to rely
on anyone else for fuel supplies, their overall environmental benefits
are dubious at best and their cost is partly to blame for our inflation
problem.
I'm starting to think that EV's are the biggest con job in history,
Govts around the world have been conned into believing that EV's are the
only solution to reducing emissions when there are very viable
alternatives that are close to production ready.

--
Daryl
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-09 00:23:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container. I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit
longer. Maybe 2 years.
Depends on how its stored, diesel needs to be sealed without any air
and then it will last a very long time, I've also used petrol that
was 5yrs old without a problem but its variable.
  A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+ years.
A rather wild guess, batteries can last a long time if stored
correctly but 10yrs is a more realistic guess.
**Which is WAY longer than oil.
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV
array, whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Certainly possible to charge an EV from solar but EV's need lots and
lots of power so it could take a very long time to fully charge
unless you have a very big solar system.
The sort of portable solar panels that a survivalist could carry in a
vehicle would take weeks to charge an EV.
**When China blockades Australian sea lanes, we will have no oil. What
will we run our cars on?
If we are forced to use electric cars most of the power will have to
come from coal or gas since almost all solar panels are made in China
which is rather ironic.
**Yep. And we should be stocking up on them. Quick smart. Australia
could make Solar PV cells. India makes them, as does the US and other
places. They're just more expensive though.
Post by Daryl
If there is a positive to electric cars its that we won't need to rely
on anyone else for fuel supplies, their overall environmental benefits
are dubious at best and their cost is partly to blame for our inflation
problem.
**Really? Prove the inflation claim.
Post by Daryl
I'm starting to think that EV's are the biggest con job in history,
Govts around the world have been conned into believing that EV's are the
only solution to reducing emissions when there are very viable
alternatives that are close to production ready.
http://youtu.be/jxtxZY45RMM
**You are, as usual, looking at ONE issue only. H2 fuel cell vehicles
are also EVs. And they represent a technology that Japan is embracing.
Fast refuelling, convenient and low emissions (if energy is derived from
renewable sources).
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Daryl
2023-03-09 01:15:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a sealed
container. I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a bit
longer. Maybe 2 years.
Depends on how its stored, diesel needs to be sealed without any air
and then it will last a very long time, I've also used petrol that
was 5yrs old without a problem but its variable.
  A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+ years.
A rather wild guess, batteries can last a long time if stored
correctly but 10yrs is a more realistic guess.
**Which is WAY longer than oil.
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV
array, whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Certainly possible to charge an EV from solar but EV's need lots and
lots of power so it could take a very long time to fully charge
unless you have a very big solar system.
The sort of portable solar panels that a survivalist could carry in
a vehicle would take weeks to charge an EV.
**When China blockades Australian sea lanes, we will have no oil.
What will we run our cars on?
If we are forced to use electric cars most of the power will have to
come from coal or gas since almost all solar panels are made in China
which is rather ironic.
**Yep. And we should be stocking up on them. Quick smart. Australia
could make Solar PV cells. India makes them, as does the US and other
places. They're just more expensive though.
Post by Daryl
If there is a positive to electric cars its that we won't need to rely
on anyone else for fuel supplies, their overall environmental benefits
are dubious at best and their cost is partly to blame for our
inflation problem.
**Really? Prove the inflation claim.
LOL, its simple mathematics, cost increases cause inflation, EV's are
way more expensive than normal cars, end of story.
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
I'm starting to think that EV's are the biggest con job in history,
Govts around the world have been conned into believing that EV's are
the only solution to reducing emissions when there are very viable
alternatives that are close to production ready.
http://youtu.be/jxtxZY45RMM
**You are, as usual, looking at ONE issue only. H2 fuel cell vehicles
are also EVs. And they represent a technology that Japan is embracing.
Fast refuelling, convenient and low emissions (if energy is derived from
renewable sources).
Did you watch the video, seems not, its not about fuel cell EV's, it
about redesigned diesel engines running on hydrogen, at this point in
time their mainly for machinery and trucks but no reason they can't be
used in cars.
Also worth noting is that the power and torque curves of the hydrogen
engines are identical to their diesel equivalents and the only emission
is water vapor.
The video also mentions that India and the USA are making massive
investments in hydrogen production.
--
Daryl
Trevor Wilson
2023-03-09 02:58:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Nomen Nescio
I bet Elon has a diesel pickup with long-range tanks to
escape the apocalyse.
**I've been thinking about that. Let's say the zombie apocalypse
happens. No more refined oil. Petrol lasts about 1 year in a
sealed container. I am uncertain, but I guess Diesel will last a
bit longer. Maybe 2 years.
Depends on how its stored, diesel needs to be sealed without any
air and then it will last a very long time, I've also used petrol
that was 5yrs old without a problem but its variable.
  A battery pack will last a lot longer. Prolly 20+ years.
A rather wild guess, batteries can last a long time if stored
correctly but 10yrs is a more realistic guess.
**Which is WAY longer than oil.
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
A survivalist will be able to charge his Tesle via his Solar PV
array, whilst the fossil fueled vehicles become useless.
Certainly possible to charge an EV from solar but EV's need lots
and lots of power so it could take a very long time to fully charge
unless you have a very big solar system.
The sort of portable solar panels that a survivalist could carry in
a vehicle would take weeks to charge an EV.
**When China blockades Australian sea lanes, we will have no oil.
What will we run our cars on?
If we are forced to use electric cars most of the power will have to
come from coal or gas since almost all solar panels are made in China
which is rather ironic.
**Yep. And we should be stocking up on them. Quick smart. Australia
could make Solar PV cells. India makes them, as does the US and other
places. They're just more expensive though.
Post by Daryl
If there is a positive to electric cars its that we won't need to
rely on anyone else for fuel supplies, their overall environmental
benefits are dubious at best and their cost is partly to blame for
our inflation problem.
**Really? Prove the inflation claim.
LOL, its simple mathematics, cost increases cause inflation, EV's are
way more expensive than normal cars, end of story.
**Except that you have failed to prove your claim. Australia's most
popular car/s are far more expensive than a Kia Picanto too. Therefore,
according to YOUR Martian economic theory, it is the fault of Ford
Rangers and Toyota Hilux (#1 & #2), not the fault of EVs. The reality is
that years of fucked up economics (thanks to the fucking idiots in the
COALition), COVID 19 and the war in Ukraine that are the root causes of
inflation, not the nadful of people buying EVs.

However, feel free to present your alternate theory, WITH DATA0
Post by Daryl
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
I'm starting to think that EV's are the biggest con job in history,
Govts around the world have been conned into believing that EV's are
the only solution to reducing emissions when there are very viable
alternatives that are close to production ready.
http://youtu.be/jxtxZY45RMM
**You are, as usual, looking at ONE issue only. H2 fuel cell vehicles
are also EVs. And they represent a technology that Japan is embracing.
Fast refuelling, convenient and low emissions (if energy is derived
from renewable sources).
Did you watch the video, seems not, its not about fuel cell EV's, it
about redesigned diesel engines running on hydrogen, at this point in
time their mainly for machinery and trucks but no reason they can't be
used in cars.
**Except that the pressure vessels are huge, heavy and inconvenient.
That, combined with the inefficiencies of IC engines, means that H2 fuel
cell vehicles are far more efficient.
Post by Daryl
Also worth noting is that the power and torque curves of the hydrogen
engines are identical to their diesel equivalents and the only emission
is water vapor.
**Same as H2 fuel cell vehicles. EXCEPT that the BEST efficiency you can
hope for is 45% for ICE and the WORST efficiency for an H2 EV is 90%.
Post by Daryl
The video also mentions that India and the USA are making massive
investments in hydrogen production.
**Sure. I've said as much. Japan is moving rapidly towards an H2
economy. For vehicles, it will be H2 fuel cell EVs.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Noddy
2023-03-09 01:18:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Trevor Wilson
Post by Daryl
Certainly possible to charge an EV from solar but EV's need lots and
lots of power so it could take a very long time to fully charge unless
you have a very big solar system.
The sort of portable solar panels that a survivalist could carry in a
vehicle would take weeks to charge an EV.
**When China blockades Australian sea lanes, we will have no oil. What
will we run our cars on?
China is not going to blockade Australia's see lanes, and even if they
did we would still have some oil :)
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.
Loading...