Post by Anonymousit was only a baby!
DOLF @ 0951 HOURS ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2018: “I swear by Almighty God that if
you ever say something of substance I might add it to my next chapter
this Yom Kippur...”
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1002 HOURS
ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2018: “I swear by almighty god that if you ever manage
to figure out how to stop top-posting I will stop calling you an idiot.”
DOLF @ 1010 HOURS ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2018: “So how long been talking to
your dick, that is if you can still see it past your belly?"
What advice then or as counsel of the church (consilia evangelica) would
they give on various *MORAL* issues as their claim to a higher obedience
than the natural law (ie. on the basis of Pythagorean HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER) which is required by others who follow the counsels to perform
acts of merit and who are thereby given a *GREATER* certainty of
salvation than those who merely follow the commands of the law. And
what then is the character of the forma corporis of your archetypal son
of man {ie. HEAVEN (H27) EARTH (H9) = MAN (H36) as #666} in relation to
your representations (conscientia erronea: erring conscience of the
reprobate *MIND* which misidentifies the good) as improper claims made
of Jesus {He is saved/A saviour; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign;
one chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}, in being then
the full embodiment of this Divine *MIND* as an AUTONOMY OF WILL?
As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then
the *MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea,
shape or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei
essentialis sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of
righteousness, holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God
in which man was originally created).
Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis
for all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a
thing including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as
the integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in
compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the
innate *MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis:
7: {
5: {1: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 5}, nous: [1]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 7, col: 9, nous: 15 [Date: 2018.12.25, Time: 1816
hrs, Super: #359 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy, Ego: #397 / #15 -
Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner
Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning; Tetra: 1 - Centre]
7: {48: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 7}, nous: [48]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 3, col: 1, nous: 67 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #408 / #63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching:
H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra:
62 - Doubt, Ego: #279 / #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading
(conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual]
},
8: {
4: {49: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 4}, nous: [49]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 4, col: 3, nous: 18 [Date: 2018.7.26, Time: 0805
hrs, Super: #395 / #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness, Ego: #421 / #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts,
Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat,
Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight]
9: {24: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 9}, nous: [24]} // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 5, nous: 1 [Date: 2018.4.3, Time: 0055
hrs, Super: #516 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 -
Sinking, Ego: #331 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy]
},
9: {
6: {25: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 6}, nous: [25]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 6, nous: 12 [Date: 2018.4.8, Time: 0115
hrs, Super: #427 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - Reach, Ego: #366 / #12 -
Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6
- Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention]
8: {72: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 8}, nous: [72]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
***@zen: 4, row: 6, col: 8, nous: 75 [Date: 2018.11.11 *AS*
*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY*, Time: 1515 hrs, Super: #367 / #76 -
Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing,
Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 - Sinking, Ego: #352 / #75 -
Destructive Envy, Harmed Through Greed; I-Ching: H52 - Restraint,
Inaction, Bound, Keeping still, mountain, Stilling; Tetra: 72 - Hardness]
}
Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as
being primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding
which grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously
acts according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and
the natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God
upon the *MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason
in its encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature
(foedus naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature
and its capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or
natural law) bestowed upon us by the graciousness of God.
I clearly do metaphysics and metempirical philosophy (perennialist
school of thought) and have an alternate gender identity and sexual
dynamic paradigm of MIND, BODY and SOUL {ie.
#902 {#22 x #41 = #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ), #12 x #41 = #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ), and #391 - HOMOIOS PRINCIPLES
(FRATERNITÉ)} as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] = nephesh
(H5315): {#18 as #430 % #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, *SELF*, *LIFE*,
*CREATURE*, *PERSON*, *APPETITE*, *MIND*, *LIVING* *BEING*, *DESIRE*,
*EMOTION*, *PASSION*; 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance
or being, soul, the inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living
being (with life in the blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or
individual; 1e) seat of the appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and
passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1) dubious; 1h) activity of the will;
1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the character; 1i1) dubious;
} captivation which is historically associated with the HETEROS THEORY
OF NUMBER as being an encapsulated microcosm as metempirical (ie. the
branch of philosophy that deals with things existing beyond the realm of
experience) philosophy as the perennialist school of thought or that of
metaphysical (ie. of things transcending what is physical or natural and
the temporal reality) dynamic perpetuated against the human psyche.
I have defined the complexities of this opposition from the perspective,
as being a composite lack of any sapient thought to any real depth,
conduct as repetitive use of idioms as mantras of opposition fixed by
symbolic associations to obsolete mathematical paradigms of *MIND* and
the re-packaging as thoughts of others which is then traditionally
characteristic of a skepticism, and narcissism as nihilism, in having
only a sensual consequence as its own defied claim to any reality.
In that, they deploy language as denial and which has its throne within
the basal realm of consciousness relating to the seat of its impulsive
desire, action as a lack of motion towards freedom from any accountability.
A habitual action of anal extrusion exhibiting an infantile psychosexual
developmental stage in which thinking and language is nothing more than
an act of defecation as the major source of sensuous pleasure where the
anus forms the *CENTRE* of self-awareness.
Although this is universally and historical declared a common good in
expressing a ’natural biological order reality’ as the basis for the
Institutional religo-political worldview as the sovereign/marriage
dynamic being the Natural / Common Law acceptance imperative as the
cultivating artifice (ie. NOT STRAIGHT OR DIRECT, AS A COURSE;
INDIRECTLY STATED OR EXPRESSED; NOT STRAIGHTFORWARD; INDIRECTLY AIMED AT
OR REACHED, AS ENDS OR RESULTS; DEVIOUSLY ACHIEVED) of the inner female
within conjugal slavitude as domesticated goddess and whilst the
emancipated male ran victorious as conquistadors within the phenomenal
realm and conquering through-out all the world.
— STRAWBERRIES —
"CALIGULA'S ARMY MARCHES, {#1}
ALL ACROSS THE LAND. {#2}
THE TRIUMPHANT ARCHES. {#3}
WITH BASKETS IN HAND. {#4}
LIKE A LITTLE SMURF, {#5}
THEY'RE HARD TO FIND. {#6}
FROM MOUNT TO SURF. {#7}
IT'S SUCH A GRIND. {#8}
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. {#9}
TIME IS MONEY. {#10}
IT'S OFF TO TRUMP TOWER. {#11}
TRY NOT TO BE FUNNY. {#12}
SPIT THE DUMMY. {#13}
SO MUCH TO COUNT. {#14}
PEE A PENNY. {#15}
MORE TO MOUNT." {#16}
YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Viva La Vida"
In the history analytical philosophy the prevailing interpretation of
the meaning of the terms such as 'BEING' or 'EXISTENCE' are as
UNIVERSALS usually defined by NUMBER and specifically the Pythagorean
HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER and were affirmed with different meanings,
respectively equivalent to being in space and time (ie. MY INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY as a universal statement which is a singularity compliant with
a DIVINE FIAT and potentiality as a cosmological / language
consideration of the chronological circumscribing given to the 10
commandments as then defining human consciousness by a cosmological
anthropic principle) and being not in space and time (ie. MY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as encapsulated by the knowledge of a ternary
HOMOIOS rather than the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER consideration).
That accordingly such establishes my distinctive INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
RIGHTS from that of ROMAN (HETEROS) EMPIRE GOVERNANCE and JUDAISM'S
TORAH CONNECTION TO IT.
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1608 HOURS
ON 26 JUNE 2018: "Maybe you could point to which one of the world's
50-odd islamic nations isn't a pustulant sh!thole?
What kind of "constructive" criticism can be levelled at an ideology
that spreads fear, stupidity, poverty and murder in every place it touches?"
— HEY GIBLET —
“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.
HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.
YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING *BOGAN*.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”
YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"
OLEG'S_HOME@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 75 (#75),
@2: Sup: 36 (#43); Ego: 3 (#78),
@3: Sup: 33 (#76); Ego: 29 (#107),
@4: Sup: 73 (#149); Ego: 49 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
@5: Sup: 25 (#174); Ego: 20 (#176),
@6: Sup: 4 (#178); Ego: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
@7: Sup: 51 (#229); Ego: 22 (#222),
@8: Sup: 43 (#272); Ego: 35 (#257),
@9: Sup: 10 (#282); Ego: 30 (#287),
@10: Sup: 20 (#302); Ego: 56 (#343),
@11: Sup: 37 (#339); Ego: 15 (#358),
@12: Sup: 5 (#344); Ego: 27 (#385),
@13: Sup: 70 (#414); Ego: 74 (#459),
Male: #414; Feme: #459
}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#292 / #416} / HETEROS {#344 / #442} / TORAH {#344
/ #442}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:6,nous:73&idea:{m,118}&idea:{f,161}&idea:{m,292}&idea:{f,416}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 6, nous: 73 [Date: 2018.9.20, Time: 11:50
hrs, Super: #292 / #80 - Primitivist Independence, Remaining in
Isolation; I-Ching: H16 - Contentment, Enthusiasm, Providing-For,
Excess; Tetra: 23 - Ease, Ego: #416 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to
Act; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7
- Ascent]
ANONYMOUS DIZUM SEWER TROLL (***@REMAILER.PARANOICI.ORG) @ 0837 HOURS
ON 20 SEPTEMBER 2018: "MEERKAT STOLEN FROM ZOO, COPS: DOLF IS 'PERSON OF
INTEREST':
it was only a baby!"
DOLF @ 2326 HOURS ON 20 SEPTEMBER 2018: "#53 - The first two antinomies
were false because they considered an appearance to be a thing–in–itself
(a thing as it is apart from being an appearance). In the last two
antinomies, due to a misunderstanding, an appearance was mistakenly
opposed to a thing–in–itself. The theses are true of the world of
things–in–themselves, or the intelligible world. The antitheses are true
of the *WORLD* *OF* *APPEARANCES*, or the phenomenal world.
In the third antinomy, the contradiction is resolved if we realize that
natural necessity is a property of things only as mere appearances,
while freedom is attributed to things–in–themselves. An action of a
rational being has two aspects or states of being: (1) as an appearance,
it is an effect of some previous cause and is a cause of some subsequent
effect, and (2) as a thing–in–itself it is free or spontaneous.
Necessity and freedom can both be predicated of reason. In the *WORLD*
*OF* *APPEARANCES*, motives necessarily cause actions. On the other
hand, rational ideas and maxims, or principles of conduct, command what
a reasonable being ought to do. All actions of rational beings, as
appearances, are strictly determined by causality. The same actions are
free when the rational being acts as a thing–in– itself in accordance
with mere practical reason.
— MAGGOTY MEAT —
"BIRDS OF A FEATHER.
OH THOU DARK RAVEN.
HOW'S THE WEATHER?
IN YOUR DANK COVEN.
NOW UPON YOU TETHER.
N'ER ETERNAL HEAVEN."
COMPULSIVE_LIAR@{
@1: Sup: 46 (#46); Ego: 46 (#46),
@2: Sup: 71 (#117); Ego: 20 (#66),
@3: Sup: 43 (#160); Ego: 1 (#67),
@4: Sup: 70 (#230); Ego: 70 (#137),
@5: Sup: 64 (#294); Ego: 20 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@6: Sup: 44 (#338); Ego: 66 (#223),
@7: Sup: 5 (#343); Ego: 23 (#246),
Male: #343; Feme: #246
}
H1403@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 5 (#8); Ego: 2 (#5),
@3: Sup: 43 (#51); Ego: 38 (#43),
@4: Sup: 53 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 10 (#53),
@5: Sup: 54 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 1 (#54),
@6: Sup: 3 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 30 (#84 - I
AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #161; Feme: #84
} // #246
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #246 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.
#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#246 as [#3, #2, #200, #10, #1, #30] = Gabriy'el (H1403): {UMBRA: #0 as
#246 % #41 = #41} 1) an archangel; the angel God used to send messages
of great importance to man; sent to Daniel {JUDGMENT OF GOD; GOD MY
JUDGE}, to Zacharias {MEMORY OF THE LORD}, and to Mary {REBELLION};
H5462@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 70 (#80); Ego: 60 (#70),
@3: Sup: 73 (#153); Ego: 3 (#73),
@4: Sup: 2 (#155); Ego: 10 (#83),
@5: Sup: 40 (#195); Ego: 38 (#121),
@6: Sup: 9 (#204); Ego: 50 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
@7: Sup: 19 (#223); Ego: 10 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #223; Feme: #181
} // #343
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #246 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.
#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#343 as [#10, #60, #3, #10, #200, #50, #10] = cagar (H5462): {UMBRA: #6
as #263 % #41 = #17} 1) to shut, close; 10) to deliver up; 100) to shut
up, imprison; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to shut; 1a2) to close, close up; 1a3)
closed up, closely joined, shut up; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be shut up;
1b2) to be shut or closed; 1c) (Piel) *TO* *SHUT* *UP*, *DELIVER* *UP*;
1d) (Pual) to be shut up; 1e) (Hiphil);
"And because I tell you the truth, ye believe {#123 - H539} me not.
Ye are of your father the devil {#351
HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#7 as #351)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 22 (#29); Ego: 15 (#22),
@3: Sup: 45 (#74); Ego: 23 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG),
@4: Sup: 76 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER); Ego: 31 (#76),
@5: Sup: 34 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW);
Ego: 39 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN),
@6: Sup: 81 (#265); Ego: 47 (#162),
@7: Sup: 55 (#320); Ego: 55 (#217),
@8: Sup: 37 (#357); Ego: 63 (#280),
@9: Sup: 27 (#384); Ego: 71 (#351),
Male: #384; Feme: #351
} // #351
}, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar {CAUSE
AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention
/ Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS*
*BINDING* *NORM*} / #111}, and the father of it.
H539@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 17 (#39); Ego: 1 (#17),
@4: Sup: 57 (#96); Ego: 40 (#57),
@5: Sup: 67 (#163); Ego: 10 (#67),
@6: Sup: 36 (#199); Ego: 50 (#117),
@7: Sup: 42 (#241); Ego: 6 (#123),
Male: #241; Feme: #123
} // #123
#123 as [#6, #10, #1, #40, #10, #50, #6] = 'aman (H539): {UMBRA: #13 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to support, confirm, be faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to support, confirm, be faithful, uphold, nourish; 1a1a) foster-father
(subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c) pillars, supporters of the
door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be faithful, be carried,
make firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made firm, sure,
lasting; 1b1c) confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified, confirmed;
1b1e) reliable, faithful, trusty; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to stand firm, to
trust, to be certain, to *BELIEVE* in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b) trust,
*BELIEVE*;
Art thou greater than our father Abraham {father of a great multitude},
which is dead? And the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself?
Jesus answered, If I honour {#123 - H3678} myself, my honour is nothing:
it is my Father that honoureth {#123 - H3678} me; of whom ye say, that
he is your God.” [John 8:23; 31-34; 39-45; 53-54 (KJV)]
The fourth antinomy is solved in the same way as the third. Nowhere in
the world of sense experiences and appearances is there an absolutely
necessary being. The whole world of sense experiences and appearances,
however, is the effect of an absolutely necessary being which can be
thought of as a thing–in–itself which is not in the *WORLD* *OF*
*APPEARANCES*. [Wikipedia 2018:Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics]
YOUTUBE: "City of the Lost Children 1995 (hidden subliminals)" as
Uploaded on 13 January, 2010
NADEGDA (FASCIST *BABYLONIAN* WHORE & KOOK) @ 0919 HOURS ON 15 JULY
2016: "DEFAMATORY, SLANDEROUS AND KNOWINGLY FALSE CONDUCT AS UNLAWFUL
USE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIAGE SERVICE FOR HARASSMENT:
Better kooks than you have tried, even striven *mightily*, and I am
still here.
[snicker]
And when you ran the above text by a lawyer, did he:
a) Guffaw
b) Chuckle
c) Howl with side-splitting laughter
d) Snicker
Every statement I've made was either factually true or fell squarely
within the realm of opinion, as does the following statement:
You, dolf, are a lunatic, and indeed a real certifiable whacko.
[snicker]"
DOLF @ 1104 HOURS ON 15 JULY 2016: "I really don't know why you believe
this message was directed at you:
I quote: "Better kooks than you have tried, even striven *mightily*, and
I am still here."
Next thing, you'll be blaming me for posting that YOUTUBE video of a
French Film titled: "City of the Lost Children 1995 (hidden
subliminals)" as a Bastille Day (14 July 2016) tribute, then being the
cause of their troubles in Nice.
BUT IT'S GOT SOME GREAT VOICE-OVERS DON'T YOU THINK?:
Cultic male: "The true light is 'Invisible'"
"Penetrate the corridors of shadows and leave the world of the 'blind'
and you'll enter the cast as world of the 'chosen ones'.
Renounce the gift of sight.
I know, there are skeptics amongst you.
Afraid to share with us the dead of night.
Be brave, renounce your gift of sight now.
Pluck out your eyes.
Come and join us.
HELP US BUILD A BETTER WORLD."
...
Male: "Hey girl, Cyclops?
Do you know where to find Cyclops?
Girl: "Will you get lost?"
Woman: "You mustn't be angry
Your 'brothers' are doing their best."
Scientist Krank: "My brothers!!"
Male: "Listen carefully."
Cultic male: "The true light.
Renounce the gift of sight.
Penetrate the corridor of shadows.
The world of the 'BLIND'.
Let us build a better world or we shall witness a rain of TERROR.
Girl: "Where do you think you are going?"
Male: "Cyclops truck on the way. Little brother."
Gabriel as Cultic Leader: "I Gabriel.
I came into this world with open eyes.
But I saw a world that was a world of DOGS.
Illiterate dogs.
And so the CREATOR sent me down here to earth to recover the power that
men have illegally seized.
My 'Brothers'.
You who have joined me in their struggle understand that together we
must fight human beings on their ground.
Only the "Third Eye" will enable you to enter the *WORLD* *OF*
*APPEARANCES*.
But beware because this world of temptation and perversion is also the
world of desire.
My brothers our race, our great supreme race shall reign once more on earth.
From that day on, our [inaudible] third eye will become useless.
The *WORLD* *OF* *APPEARANCES* will be abolished."
"[IDEA @343] In the first (mathematical) class of antinomy, the falsity
of the presupposition consisted in the following: that something
self-contradictory (namely, appearance as a thing in itself) would be
represented as being unifiable in a concept. But regarding the second,
namely the dynamical, class of antinomy, the falsity of the
presupposition consists in this: that something that is unifiable is
represented as contradictory; consequently, while in the first case both
of the mutually opposing assertions were false, here on the contrary the
assertions, which are set in opposition to one another through mere
misunderstanding, can both be true.
Specifically, mathematical combination necessarily presupposes the
homogeneity of the things combined (in the concept of magnitude), but
dynamical connection does not require this at all. If it is a question
of the magnitude of something extended, all parts must be homogeneous
among themselves and with the whole; in contrast, in the connection of
cause and effect homogeneity can indeed be found, but is not necessary;
for the concept of causality (whereby through one thing, something
completely different from it is posited) at least does not require it.
If the objects of the sensible world were taken for things in
themselves, and the previously stated natural laws for laws of things in
themselves, contradiction would be inevitable. In the same way, if the
subject of freedom were represented, like the other objects, as a mere
appearance, contradiction could again not be avoided, for the same thing
would be simultaneously affirmed and denied of the same object in the
same sense. But if natural necessity is referred only to appearances and
freedom only to things in themselves, then no contradiction arises if
both kinds of causality are assumed or conceded equally, however
difficult or impossible it may be to make causality of the latter kind
conceivable.
Within appearance, every effect is an event, or something that happens
in time; the effect must, in accordance with the universal law of
nature, be preceded by a determination of the causality of its cause (a
state of the cause), from which the effect follows in accordance with a
constant law. But this determination of the cause to causality must also
be something that occurs or takes place; the cause must have begun to
act, for otherwise no sequence in time could be thought between it and
the effect. Both [IDEA @344] the effect and the causality of the cause
would have always existed. Therefore the determination of the cause to
act must also have arisen among the appearances, and so it must, like
its effect, be an event, which again must have its cause, and so on, and
hence natural necessity must be the condition in accordance with which
efficient causes are determined. Should, by contrast, freedom be a
property of certain causes of appearances, then that freedom must, in
relation to the appearances as events, be a faculty of starting those
events from itself (sponte), i.e., without the causality of the cause
itself having to begin, and hence without need for any other ground to
determine its beginning. But then the cause, as to its causality, would
not have to be subject to temporal determinations of its state, i.e.,
would not have to be appearance at all, i.e., would have to be taken for
a thing in itself, and only the effects would have to be taken for
appearances. If this sort of influence of intelligible beings on
appearances can be thought without contradiction, then natural necessity
will indeed attach to every connection of cause and effect in the
sensible world, and yet that cause which is itself not an appearance
(though it underlies appearance) will still be entitled to freedom, and
therefore nature and freedom will be attributable without contradiction
to the very same thing, but in different respects, in the one case as
appearance, in the other as a thing in itself.
We have in us a faculty that not only stands in connection with its
subjectively determining grounds, which are the natural causes of its
[IDEA @235] actions – and thus far is the faculty of a being which
itself belongs to appearances – but that also is related to objective
grounds that are mere ideas, insofar as these ideas can determine this
faculty, a connection that is expressed by ought.j This faculty is
called reason, and insofar as we are considering a being (the human
being) solely as regards this objectively determinable reason, this
being cannot be considered as a being of the senses; rather, the
aforesaid property is the property of a thing in itself, and the
possibility of that property – namely, how the ought, which has never
yet happened, can determine the activity of this being and can be the
cause of actions whose effect is an appearance in the sensible world –
we cannot comprehend at all. Yet the causality of reason with respect to
effects in the sensible world would nonetheless be freedom, insofar as
objective grounds, which are themselves ideas, are taken to be
determining with respect to that causality. For the action of that
causality would in that case not depend on any subjective, hence also
not on any temporal conditions, and would therefore also not depend on
the natural law that serves to determine those conditions, because
grounds of reason provide the rule for actions universally, from
principles, without influence from the circumstances of time or place.
What I adduce here counts only as an example, for intelligibility, and
does not belong necessarily to our question, which must be decided from
mere concepts independently of properties that we find in the actual world.
I can now say without contradiction: all actions of rational beings,
insofar as they are appearances (are encountered in some experience or
other), are subject to natural necessity; but the very same actions,
with respect only to the rational subject and its faculty of acting in
accordance with bare reason, are free. What, then, is required for
natural necessity? Nothing more than the determinability of every event
in the sensible world according to constant laws, and therefore a
relation to a cause within appearance; whereby the underlying thing in
itself and its causality remain unknown. But I say: the law of nature
remains, whether the rational being be a cause of effects in the
sensible world through reason and hence through freedom, or whether that
being does not determine such effects through rational grounds. For if
the first is the case, the action takes place according to maxims whose
effect within appearance will always conform to constant laws; if the
second is the case, and the action does not take [IDEA @346] place
according to principles of reason, then it is subject to the empirical
laws of sensibility, and in both cases the effects are connected
according to constant laws; but we require nothing more for natural
necessity, and indeed know nothing more of it. In the first case,
however, reason is the cause of these natural laws and is therefore
free, in the second case the effects flow according to mere natural laws
of sensibility, because reason exercises no influence on them; but,
because of this, reason is not itself determined by sensibility (which
is impossible), and it is therefore also free in this case. Therefore
freedom does not impede the *NATURAL* *LAW* *APPEARANCES*, any more than
this law interferes with the freedom of the practical use of reason, a
use that stands in connection with things in themselves as determining
grounds.
RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
Can the noumenon *ONTIC* reality as MICROCOSM which is prerequisite for
the genesis of any forecasting be readily distilled by starting at the
#0 - ‘OTH {eg: New moon 🌑 on Thursday 21 March 1996 + #2184 cycle x 6 =
20 February 2020 with new moon 🌑 Wednesday 26 February 2020 (6 days)}
and twinning the #2184 cycle as phenomenal reality against the noumena
so as to acquire a dialectic stratum as spectrum.
Can this then form the syncretic binding norm basis for the cognition of
the MACROCOSM itself which is traditionally understood in measured terms of:
#15 ... #34 ... #65 ... #111 ... #175 ... #260 ... #369
CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol Invictus}:
6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke 1:19-38] /
{#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To Foresee /
For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial /
bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]
Thus the cosmos is an intuitive reality as consciousness which being a
paradigm of dispensational governance provides the regulated ONTIC /
ONTOLOGICAL (ANTHROPOCENTRIC) framework for ARTIFICIAL INTELLECTUAL
nuance to occur in the same way that cars drive on roads and trains on
tracks.
ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso
{#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INRI AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do
Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous Nature]
7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) what ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by
the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
In this way practical freedom – namely, that freedom in which reason has
causality in accordance with objective determining grounds – is rescued,
without natural necessity suffering the least harm with respect to the
very same effects, as appearances. This can also help elucidate what we
have had to say about transcendental freedom and its unification with
natural necessity (in the same subject, but not taken in one and the
same respect). For, as regards transcendental freedom, any beginning of
an action of a being out of objective causes is always, with respect to
these determining grounds, a first beginning, although the same action
is, in the series of appearances, only a sub-alternate beginning, prior
to which a state of the cause must precede which determines that cause
and which is itself determined in the same way by an immediately
preceding cause: so that in rational beings (or in general in any
beings, provided that their causality is determined in them as things in
themselves) one can conceive of a faculty for beginning a series of
states spontaneously without falling into contradiction with the laws of
nature. For the relation of an action to the objective grounds of reason
is not a temporal relation; here, that which determines the causality
does not precede the action as regards time, because such determining
grounds do not represent the relation of objects to the senses (and so
to causes within appearance), but rather they represent determining
causes as things in themselves, which are not subject to temporal
conditions. Hence the action can be regarded as a first beginning with
respect to the causality of reason, but can nonetheless at [IDEA @347]
the same time be seen as a mere subordinated beginning with respect to
the series of appearances, and can without contradiction be considered
in the former respect as free, in the latter (since the action is mere
appearance) as subject to natural necessity.
As regards the fourth antinomy, it is removed in a similar manner as was
the conflict of reason with itself in the third. For if only the cause
in the appearances is distinguished from the cause of the appearances
insofar as the latter cause can be thought as a thing in itself, then
these two propositions can very well exist side by side, as follows:
that there occurs no cause of the sensible world (in accordance with
similar laws of causality) whose existence is absolutely necessary, as
also on the other side: that this world is nonetheless connected with a
necessary being as its cause (but of another kind and according to
another law) – the inconsistency of these two propositions resting
solely on the mistake of extending what holds merely for appearances to
things in themselves, and in general of mixing the two of these up into
one concept." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @343 to @347]
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 18 September 2018 as Yom Kippur edition
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.